Theory and Practice in Language Studies, Vol 3, No 1 (2013), 1-6, Jan 2013
doi:10.4304/tpls.3.1.1-6

Equivalence in Translation Theories: A Critical Evaluation

Despoina Panou

Abstract


The concept of equivalence can be said to hold a central position in translation studies. Nevertheless, it has been a rather controversial one, causing many heated debates among translators as to its nature, definition and applicability. The aim of the present paper is to provide a critical evaluation of the most influential equivalence theories that have been proposed by scholars in the field, such as Vinay and Darbelnet (1958), Jakobson (1959), Nida and Taber (1969), Catford (1965), House (1997), Koller (1979), Newmark (1981), Baker (1992), and finally, Pym (2010). These theories are presented  so as to provide a better understanding of how the concept evolved. It is concluded that the usefulness or not of the concept of equivalence to the translation process varies according to the stance of the translators concerned on what they regard are the virtues of equivalence itself.


Keywords


equivalence; translation theories; source-language; target-language

References


 

[1] Baker, M. (1992). In Other Words. A Coursebook on Translation. London: Routledge.
http://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9780203327579 [2] Broeck, R. van den. (1978). The concept of equivalence in translation theory. Some critical reflections. In Holmes, J.S., Lambert, J. and Broeck, R. van den (eds.) Literature and Translation. Leuven: Academic, 29-47.  [3] Catford, J.C. (1965). A Linguistic Theory of Translation. London: Oxford University Press.
PMid:19994369 PMCid:1898316 [4] Chomsky, N. (1965). Aspects of the Theory of Syntax. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. [5] Gentzler, E. (2001). Contemporary Translation Theories. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.
PMid:11322086 [6] Holmes, J.S. (1972). The Name and Nature of Translation Studies. Unpublished manuscript. Amsterdam: Translation Studies Section, Department of General Studies.  [7] Holmes, J.S. (1988/2000). The name and nature of translation studies. In Venuti, L. (ed) (2000), The Translation Studies Reader. London and New York: Routledge, 172-185.  [8] House, J. (1997). Translation Quality Assessment: A Model Revisited. Tübingen: Narr. [9] Jakobson, R. (1959/2000). On linguistics aspects of translation. In Venuti, L. (ed.) (2000), The Translation Studies Reader. London and New York: Routledge, 113-118.  [10] Grice, H.P. (1975). Logic and conversation. In Cole, P. and Morgan, J. (eds.) Syntax and Semantics 3: Pragmatics. New York: Academic Press, 41-58. [11] Koller, W. (1979). Einführung in die Übersetzungswissenschaft. Heidelberg: Quelle and Meyer. [12] Lefevere, A. (1993). Translating Literature: Practice and Theory in a Comparative Literature Context. New York: The Modern Language Association of America. [13] Leonardi, V. (2007). Gender and Ideology in Translation. Do Women and Men Translate Differently? Bern and Oxford: Peter Lang. [14] Malmkjaer, K. (2005). Linguistics and the Language of Translation. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press. [15] Munday, J. (2000). Introducing Translation Studies. London and New York: Routledge. [16] Newmark, P. (1981). Approaches to Translation. Oxford and New York: Pergamon Press.
PMCid:349070 [17] Newmark, P. (1988). A Textbook of Translation. New York: Prentice Hall. [18] Nida, E. (1964). Towards a Science of Translating. Leiden: E.J. Brill. [19] Nida, E. (1969). Science of translation. Language 45, 483-498.
http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/411434 [20] Nida, E. and Taber, C.R. (1969). The Theory and Practice of Translation. Leiden: E.J. Brill.
PMid:5775197 [21] Pym, A. (1998). Method in Translation History. Manchester: St Jerome. [22] Pym, A. (2010). Exploring Translation Theories. London and New York: Routledge. [23] Snell-Hornby, M. (1988). Translation Studies: An Integrated Approach. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins. [24] Toury, G. (1995). Descriptive Translation Studies and Beyond. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins. [25] Vandepitte, S. (2008). Remapping Translation Studies: towards a translation studies ontology. Meta 53(3), 569-588.
http://dx.doi.org/10.7202/019240ar [26] Vinay, J.P. and Darbelnet, J. (1958). Stylistique Comparée du Francais et de l'Anglais: Méthode de Traduction. Paris: Didier. (Transl. and ed. by Sager, J.C. and Hamel, M.J. (1995) as Comparative Stylistics of French and English: A Methodology for Translation. Amsterdam and Philadephia: John Benjamins.)


Full Text: PDF


Theory and Practice in Language Studies (TPLS, ISSN 1799-2591)

Copyright @ 2006-2014 by ACADEMY PUBLISHER – All rights reserved.