Theory and Practice in Language Studies, Vol 2, No 10 (2012), 2209-2218, Oct 2012
doi:10.4304/tpls.2.10.2209-2218

Exploring the Textual Variations of Metaphors in Terms of Rank Dimension and Their Discoursal Values across Different Text-types

Abbassi Bonabi Mina, Hemmati Fatemeh

Abstract


Working within the framework of Systemic- Functional Grammar and defining metaphorical expressions as a textual / intertextual strategy, bringing `guest images` from other universes of discourse to the semantic realm of texts, and also believing that the occurrence of metaphoric expressions in texts is meaningful and motivated, in this study we looked at the textual variations in terms of rank dimension across three different genres of scientific, literary and journalistic texts. We found out that these different genres cannot be differentiated from each other in terms of presence or absence of this strategy. Indeed metaphorical expressions appear in all text types. We speculate that different dimensions of meaning are added to the text through use of this strategy across different   genres. The findings of this study revealed that this strategy contributes to ideational function of the texts in the scientific text type. Our study revealed that in the literary and journalistic texts, this strategy contributes to ’textual function’ as well as ‘ideational function’ of the texts. In journalistic texts, the main function of metaphors is to contribute to the ‘indirectness’ of the texts. In literature, metaphoric wordings are ‘thematically motivated’, reinforcing the theme of the texts. For this purpose 14 different texts from different text-types are selected to be analyzed in term of the use of metaphorical expressions.


Keywords


metaphor / metaphoric expression; intertextuality; variations in rank dimension; textual function; ideational function; indirectness; thematically motivated element

References


 

[1] Bridge C.K and Winkielman, P. (2003). `What is an unconscious emotion? (The case for unconscious 'Liking")` In cognition and Emotion 17 (2) 181-211
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02699930302289 [2] Birch, D. (1991). Language, literature and critical practice, Routledge.11 New Fetter Lane, London. [3] Burnes, Susan. (2011). "Metaphors in press reports of election: Obama walked on water, but Musharraf was beaten by a knockout", Journal of Pragmatics 43(2011) 2160-2175.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2011.01.010 [4] Butt, D. (1988). 'Ideational meaning and existential fabric of a poem' in Fawcett, R.P. & Young D. J. (eds.) New Developments in Systemic Linguistics Vol. 2 Theory and Applications. Printer Publishers. Pp. 174-218. London. [5] Candlin, C. and Lotfipour- Saedi, k. (1983). 'Processes of discourse`. Journal of Applied Language Studies 1(2), 103-310. [6] Dastjerdi & Talebinezhad. (2000). `Knowledge of figurative language in reading comprehension and poetry Appreciation` in Iranian journal of applied linguistics vol.4 no.2, pp. 113-130. [7] Debatin, B. (1997). metaphors and computers. Semiotic Rev. Book 3(1) [8] Deming, Robert, H. (1986). `Theorizing, Textuality, Intertextuality`. Journal of communication Inquiry 10/3 pp.32-44.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/019685998601000304 [9] Fairclough, N. (1990). Language and power, London. Longman [10] Fairclough, N. (2010). Critical Discourse Analysis, Longman UK. [11] Fowler, R. (1985). `Power` in van Dijk (ed.) Handbook of Discourse analysis, New York: Academic press. [12] Geyer- Rayan, H. (1991). Hetroglossia in the poetry of Bertolt Brecht and Tony Harrison' in Willie van Peer (ed.) The Taming of the Text, Rutledge, London [13] Halliday, M.A.K (1973). Exploration in the function of language, London: Edward Arnold.
PMCid:1587677 [14] Halliday, M.A.K. (1978). Language as social semiotics: the social interpretation of language and meaning. Edward Arnold, London [15] Halliday, M.A.K. (1985). An introduction to Functional Grammar, London: Edward Arnold. [16] Haliday` M.A.K & Hasan` R. (1976). 'Cohesion in English` London: Longman. [17] Halliday` M.A.K. Hasan` R. (1990). Language, Context and Text: Aspects of Language in a Social Semiotic Perspective` Oxford university Press. Oxford [18] Kingsbury` D.T. and Wagner. G.E (1990). MICROBILOGY. Harwal publishing company, media, Pennsylvania. [19] Lakoff, G. (1991). `Metaphor and War: the Metaphor system used to justify war in the Gulf (part 1 of 2) ` Vietnam Generation Journal & Newsletter V3.n3. [20] Lakoff. (1995). `Metaphor, morality, and politics, or, why conservatives have left liberals in the dust`. Social Research vol.62,no.2 [21] Lakoff .G. (2003). `Metaphor and War again, AlterNet. [22] Lotfipour- Saedi, K. (1989). `Analyzing Literary discourse: Implication for literary translation. `A paper presented at the first Tabriz University Conference on translation. Iran Tabriz University. [23] Lotfipour –Saedi, K. (1992). 'Analysing literary discourse: implication for literary translation' in Meta 37-2 p. 389-397. [24] Lotfipour –Saedi, K. (1993). Lexical Cohesion and Translation Equivalence'. A paper presented at AILA, Amsterdam. [25] Lotfipour –Saedi, K. (2006). On Discoursal Function of Some Special Textual Strategies in Poetic Texts: Implication for Literary Translation in Meta 51-3 p. 545-550 [26] Lotfipour, Saedi, K. & Abbasi Bonabi M. (2000). 'Intertextuality as a Textual Strategy: Explorations in its Modes & Functions' Iranian Journal of Applied Linguistics. Vol.4 No. 2 pp: 79-112. [27] Lotfipour –Saedi, K. & Abbasi Bonabi M. (2001). 'Intertextuality as a Textual Strategy: Explorations in its Modes & Functions' Iranian Journal of Applied Linguistics. Vol.5 No.1 pp. 36-54 [28] Martin, J.P. (1995). 'Text and clause: Fractal resonance' in Text 15(1) pp. 5-42.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/text.1.1995.15.1.5 [29] Mie-zhen Liao. (1991). 'Metaphor as a Textual strategy in English' in Text Vol.19-(2). de Gruyter [30] Nucci, Larry, P. (2001). Education in the moral domain. Cambridge University Press, UK.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511605987 [31] Otero C.P. (ed.) (2003). Chomsky on Democracy & Education. Routledge. Falmer [32] Ortony, A. (1980). `Metaphor: A Multidimensional problem` in Ortony (ed.) Metaphor & Thought. Cambridge university press.UK. [33] Pefister M. (1991). 'How postmodern is intertextuality' in Plett (ed.) Intertextuality Wahter de Guyter. [34] Perrine, L. (1974). Literature, Sound and Sense vol.1, 2 & 3. Harcourt Brace Jovanovich, Inc [35] Rohrer, T. (1995). `The Cognitive Science of metaphor from Philosophy` to neuropsychology` rohrer@ darkwing, Uoregon .edu. [36] Ryan, K. (1991). 'Romeo and Juliet: the language of tragedy' in Willie van Peer (ed.) The Taming of the Text, Routledge, London. [37] Searle, J. R. (1980). `Metaphor` in Orteny (ed.) Metaphor and thought, Cambridge university press, UK. [38] Still, Judith& Worton, Michael. (1990). 'Introduction' in Michael Worton and Judith Still (eds.) Intertextuality: Theory and Practices. Manchester University press pp. 1-44. Manchester [39] Tendahl, Markus & Gibbs. (2008). 'Complementary perspectives on metaphor: Cognitive linguistics and relevance theory' Journal of Pragmatics 40 (2008) 1823-1864
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2008.02.001 [40] Threadgold, Terry. (1987). 'Changing the subject` in Ross Steel & Terry Threadgold (eds.) Language Topics: Essays in Honor of Michael Halliday vol.2. Amsterdam/ Pladelphia John Benjamins.
http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/1773065


Full Text: PDF


Theory and Practice in Language Studies (TPLS, ISSN 1799-2591)

Copyright @ 2006-2014 by ACADEMY PUBLISHER – All rights reserved.