Theory and Practice in Language Studies, Vol 2, No 9 (2012), 1868-1876, Sep 2012
doi:10.4304/tpls.2.9.1868-1876

The Impact of Using Etymological Analysis on Teaching Vocabulary to EFL University Students

Effat Hosseini, Shahrzad Sarfallah, Fateme Bakhshipour, Hamid Reza Dolatabadi

Abstract


Being disappointed in retention of previously encountered vocabularies is one of the most reported displeasures that EFL students have faced during vocabulary acquisition so far. Since most of the English words descend from Greek and Latin roots, among the multitude of distinct strategies employed in teaching vocabulary, providing learners with an awareness of how existing words are able to be dismantled into different roots, not only generate the opportunity to let them discover the meaning of the words for themselves but also makes them capable of retrieving the targeted words easily. The present study, thus, aimed at exploring the very effect of teaching vocabulary to 59 participants who belonged to two intact classes. They were assigned to experimental and control groups. As far as the level of vocabulary proficiency was concerned, a pretest was administered to both groups. While the control group was going to acquire new words by means of dictionary, and through inferencing the meaning of unfamiliar words from text,  the experimental group received treatment based on etymological analysis. After 6 weeks, an immediate posttest was administered to both experimental and control groups. The results were analyzed through one-way Analysis of Covariance (ANCOVA). Subsequently, a questionnaire was given to the experimental group in order to collect their opinions regarding the effectiveness of teaching vocabulary through etymology. Findings indicated that experimental group outperformed the control group. Consequently, the positive effect of this strategy and its implication in teaching vocabulary was manifested by opinions elicited from the experimental group.


Keywords


vocabulary learning; etymology; retention; roots; dictionary learning

References


 

[1] Baleghizadeh, S., & Yousefpoori Naeim. M. (2011). Enhancing vocabulary retention through semantic mapping: A single-subject study. The International Journal of Language Society and culture. (32), 11-6.

[2] Baumann, J.F., Kame’enui, E.J., & Ash, G. (2003). Research on vocabulary instruction: Voltaire redux. In J. Fllod, D. Lapp, J.R. Squire., & J. Jenson. (Eds.), Handbook of research on teaching the English Language Arts (2nd ed.).Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

[3] Bellomo, T. S. (1999). Etymology and vocabulary development for the L2 college student. Teaching English as a Second or Foreign Language, 4(2).

[4] Bleckey, B. (2006). Rethinking vocabulary instruction. Retrieved February 15, 2012 from Pedagogy in practice: http://www.pedagogypractice.blogspot.com/feeds/posts/default?orderby=updated

[5] Bogaards, P. (2001). Lexical units and the learning of foreign language vocabulary. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 23, 321-43.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0272263101003011

[6] Brown, T. S., & Perry, F. L. Jr. (1991). A comparison of three learning strategies for ESL vocabulary acquisition. TESOL Quarterly, 25(1), 17-32.

[7] Gough, P. B. & Tunmer, W. E. (1986). Decoding, reading, and reading disability. Remedial and Special Education, 7, 6-10.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/074193258600700104

[8] Hassan, F. (2002). Developing competent readers. In M.K. David, & F. Hashim. (Eds.), Developing reading skills (pp.107-139). Malaysia: Sasbadi Sdn. Bhd. http://www.pedagogypractice.blogspot.com/2006/12/rethinkingvocabulary-instruction.html

[9] Meara, P. (1981). Vocabulary Acquisition: A neglected aspects of language learning. Language Teaching and Linguistics Abstract, 14, 221-46.

[10] National Reading Panel. (2000). Report of the National Reading Panel: Teaching children to read. Washington, D.C.: National Institute of Child Health and Human Development.

[11] Paribakht, T. S., & M. Wesche. (1999). Reading and incidental L2 vocabulary acquisition: An introspective study on lexical inferencing. Studies in Second Language Acquisition (21), 195-224.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S027226319900203X

[12] Pikulski, J., & Templeton, Sh. (2004). Teaching and developing vocabulary: Key to long-term reading success. Retrieved February 15, 2012 from www.eduplace.com

[13] Raptis, H. (1997). Is second language reading vocabulary best learned by reading? Canadian Modern Language Review, 53, 566-80.

[14] Schmitt, N. (2008). Instructed second language vocabulary learning. Language Teaching Research, 12, 329-63.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1362168808089921

[15] Swan, M. (1998). Seven bad reasons for teaching grammar - and two good ones. English Teaching Professional, 7, 3-5.

[16] Trench, R. (1998). The study of words. London: John Parker.

[17] Zimmerman, C. B. (1997). Do reading and interactive vocabulary instruction make a difference? An empirical study. TESOL Quarterly, 31, 121-40.
http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/3587978


Full Text: PDF


Theory and Practice in Language Studies (TPLS, ISSN 1799-2591)

Copyright @ 2006-2012 by ACADEMY PUBLISHER – All rights reserved.