Gender-induced Variation in L2 Production: The Case of Reference Terms

Abstract

[1] Adamson. H. D. (2009). Interlanguage variation in theoretical and pedagogical perspective. New York: Routledge.

[2] Allen, M. (1994). Adventures with „Robin Hood‟: Gender Conict on a. rst-year bulletin board. Journal of Teaching Writing, 13, 169– 196.

[3] Barber, M., Sullivan, L., & Walker, J. (1997). Body, identity, and access: Diversity and networked environments [Letter from the guest editors]. Computers and Composition, 14 (Special issue), 163–167.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S8755-4615(97)90017-7

[4] Bavin, E. L., (2004). Focusing on „where‟: An analysis of Warlpiri frog stories. In S. Stromqvist & L. Verhoeven (Eds.), Relating Events in Narrative: Typological and Contextual Perspectives (pp. 17–35). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

[5] Berman, R. (Ed.). (2004). Language Development across Childhood and Adolescence. Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins.

[6] Berman, r. (2009). Language development in narrative contexts. In Bavin, E, L. (ed). The Cambridge handbook of child language. Camdridge University press.

[7] Brown, G. Anderson, A. Shillcock, R. and Yule, G. (1984). Teaching talk: strategies for production and Assessment. Cambridge 196. University Press.

[8] Brownlow, S., Rosamon, J. A., & Parker, J. A. (2003). Gender-linked linguistic behavior in television interviews. Sex Roles, 49, 121–132.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/A:1024404812972

[9] Cheshire, J. (1999). Spoken Standard English. In A.R. Bex and R.J. Watts (eds.) Standard English: The Continuing Debate (pp. 129-145). London: Routledge.

[10] Colley, A., Todd, Z., Bland, M., Holmes, M., Khanom, M., & Pike, H. (2004). Style and content in emails and letters to male and female friends. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 23, 369–378.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0261927X04266812

[11] Ellis, R. (1994). The study of second language acquisition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

[12] Fasold, R. (1985). Perspectives on sociolinguistic variation. Language in Society, 14, 515–526.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0047404500011490

[13] Foster, P., & Skehan, P. (1999). The influence of source of planning and focus of planning on task-based performance. Language Teaching Research, 3, 215–247.

[14] Halliday, M. A. K., & Hasan, R. (1976). Cohesion in English. London: Longman.

[15] Houston, S. (1985). Continuity and change in English morphology: The variable ING. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. University of Pennsylvania.

[16] Hulstijin, J. and Hulstijin, W. (1984). Grammatical errors as function of processing constraints and explicit knowledge. Language learning, 43, 23-43.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-1770.1984.tb00994.x

[17] Labov, W. (1966). The social stratification of English in New York City. Washington, DC: Center for Applied Linguistics.

[18] Lakoff, R. (1972). Language in context. Language, 48:907--924. 1975. Language and Woman’s Place. New York: Harper and Row.

[19] Mitchell, R., and Myles, R. (2003). Second Language Learning Theories. London: Edward Arnold.

[20] Mulac, A., Wiemann, J. M., Widenmann, S. J., & Gibson, T. W. (1988). Male/female language differences and effects in same-sex and mixed-sex dyads: The gender-linked language effect. Communication Monographs, 55, 315–335.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/03637758809376175

[21] Ning, H, X. Dai & f. Zhang (2010) . On Gender Difference in English Language and Its Causes. Asian Social science. Vol 6. No.2. 126-130.

[22] O‟Kearney, R., & Dadds, M. (2004). Developmental and gender differences in the language for emotions across the adolescent years. Cognition and Emotion, 18(7), 913-938.

[23] Preston, D.(1996). Variationist linguistics and second language acquisition in Ritchie & Bhatia (Eds). The handbook of second language acquisition. Academic press, US.

[24] Rahimpour, M. (1997). Task complexity, task condition and variation in L2 oral discourse. Unpublished PhD Thesis. The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia.

[25] Robinson, P. (2003). The Cognition Hypothesis, task design and adult task-based language learning. Second Language Studies, 21(2), 45–107.

[26] Rong, W. & S. Yu Hsieh (2007). gender differences in the language for emotions. Asian Journal of Management and Humanity Sciences, Vol. 2, Nos. 1-4, pp. 89-97, 2007

[27] Romaine, S. 2003: Variation. In Doughty, C.J. and Long, M.H. (eds), The handbook of second language acquisition. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing, 409-35.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/9780470756492.ch14

[28] Selfe, C. (1999). Technology and literacy: A story about the perils of not paying attention. College Composition and Communication, 50, 411–436.
http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/358859

[29] Tarone, E. (1988). Variation in interlanguage. London: Edward Arnold.

[30] Towell, R. and Hawkins, R. (1994). Approaches to second language acquisition. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.

[31] West, C. & D. Zimmerman. (1987). Doing gender. Gender and Society, 1:125--151.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0891243287001002002

[32] Wolfram, W. (1975). Variable constraints and rule relations. In R. W. Fasold & R. W. Shuy, (Eds.), Analyzing variation in language (pp. 70–88). Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.

[33] Wolfe, J. (1999). Why do women feel ignored? Gender differences in computer-mediated classroom interactions. Computer and Composition, 16(1), 153–166.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S8755-4615(99)80011-5

[34] Young, R. (1988). Variation and the interlanguage hypothesis. Studies in second language Acquisition, 10, 281-302.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0272263100007464

[35] Yousefi, M. H. (2009). The effect of task complexity on learner uptake. Unpublished M. A. Thesis. University of Tabriz, Iran.