Theory and Practice in Language Studies, Vol 2, No 8 (2012), 1678-1683, Aug 2012
doi:10.4304/tpls.2.8.1678-1683

A Study on CLL Method in Reading Course

Yan Zhang

Abstract


This paper, by comparing the effects of cooperative language learning (CLL) with that of individual-oriented traditional teaching method, seeks to explore the effective use and possible problems of cooperative language learning in college foreign language teaching. The academic achievement, retention of academic content and attitudes towards the teaching methods are used as criteria to determine the effectiveness of the two methods in classroom.


Keywords


cooperative language learning; foreign language teaching; college stage

References


 

[1] Chafe, A. (1998). Cooperative Learning and the Second Language Classroom. http://www.Stemnet.nf.ca/achafe/home-index.html (accessed 1/5/2003).

[2] Crandall, J. (1999). Cooperative language learning and affective factors. In Arnold, J (Eds.) Affect in Language Learning. Cambridge University Press. Beijing: Foreign language Teaching and Research Press, 2001, 226-245.

[3] Deng, Hai & Che, Yu. (2010). An Empirical Study of the Impact of Cooperative Language Learning on Students’ Metacognition. Foreign Language World. 6, 57-63

[4] Felder, R.M., & Brent, R. (1994). Cooperative learning in technical courses: Procedures, pitfalls, and payoffs. ERIC Document Reproduction Service. http://www2.ncsu.edu/effective_teaching/ (accessed 1/11/2007).

[5] Freed, S. (1994). Cooperative Learning and EFL Reading Comprehension. http://www.surrey.ac.uk/ELI/freeds.html (accessed 21/3/2003).

[6] Glosser, G. (2012). Cooperative learning Technique. http://www.mathgoodies.com/articles/coop_learning.html (accessed 1/6/2012).

[7] Li, Jieli. (2007). Study on the Feasibility of Cooperative Learning in Large College English Class. Journal of Xi’ an Foreign Languages University. 15(3), 97-100

[8] Johnson, D.W., & Johnson, R.T. (1991). Learning Together and Alone: Cooperative, Competitive, and Individualistic (3rd Edition). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.

[9] Johnson, D.W., & Johnson, R. T. (2000). Cooperative Learning Center. http://www.co-operation.org/ (accessed 15/4/2003).

[10] Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. (1989). Cooperation and Competition: Theory and Research. Edina, MN: Interaction Book Company.

[11] Johnson, D.W., Johnson, R.T., & Holubec, E.J. (1986). Circles of learning: Cooperation in the Classroom. Edina, MN: Interaction Book Company.

[12] Johnson, D., Johnson, R., and Smith, K. (1991). Active Learning: Cooperation in the College Classroom. Edina, MN: Interaction Book Company.

[13] Nunan, D. (1989). Designing Tasks for the Communicative Classroom. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

[14] Sharan, S. et al. (1984). Cooperative Learning in the Classroom: Research in Desegregated Schools. Hillsdale, N.J.: Erlbaum.

[15] Shi,Jinfang & Ji, Rongqin. (2010). Fostering Science-and-Technology Students Autonomy in Web-based Learning Environment: An Empirical Study Based on Cooperative Learning. Journal of Xi’ an Foreign Languages University . 18(2), 97-100

[16] Slavin, R.E. (1990). Cooperative Learning: Theory, Research, and Practice. New Jersey: Prentice Hall.

[17] Slavin, R. E. (1995). Cooperative Learning: Theory, Research, and Practice (2nd edition). Boston: Allyn and Bacon.

[18] Su, Zhenli, et al. (2000). Application of Controlled learning and Cooperative Learning in Teaching English Listening. Computer-assisted Foreign Language Education. 75(3), 36-40.

[19] Zhang, Fake & Zhao, Ting. (2004). The Application of Cooperative Learning Theory in College English Reading Class. Computer-assisted Foreign Language Education. 104(6), 46-51.

[20] Zhang, Yan. (2010). Cooperative Language Learning and Foreign Language Learning and Teaching. Journal of Language Teaching and Research.1(1), 81-83
http://dx.doi.org/10.4304/jltr.1.1.81-83


Full Text: PDF


Theory and Practice in Language Studies (TPLS, ISSN 1799-2591)

Copyright @ 2006-2014 by ACADEMY PUBLISHER – All rights reserved.