Theory and Practice in Language Studies, Vol 2, No 8 (2012), 1570-1575, Aug 2012
doi:10.4304/tpls.2.8.1570-1575

Investigating Controversies in Teaching Grammar: A Case for the Iranian High School Students

Fatemeh Abbasian Boroujeni

Abstract


The fact that L2 learners need to learn grammar is now a well- established fact (Celce- Murcia, 1991; Foto, 1994; Sheen, 2003; Davies, 2006; Ellis, 2006; Borg and Burns, 2008; Cullen, 2008). What has remained controversial is ‘how to teach grammar to help L2 learners acquire it. The present study was designed on a qualitative-quantitative survey basis using a semi-structured interview and questionnaire on the effectiveness of different approaches in teaching grammar which was administered to 128 students and 5 EFL instructors in four high schools in Isfahan province, the city of Falavarjan. The results of the study revealed that the students and instructors preferred 'focus on form (FonF)' instructional method. The results also demonstrated that some of the participants favored a teacher fronted classroom with an emphasis on explicit grammar instruction. The results of the study is in line with the related literature in grammar teaching approaches that 'focus on form' (FonF) acts as a middle-way between the two extremes of (FonFs) and 'focus on meaning (FonM)'. Moreover, the role of L1 in the grammar instruction cannot be stigmatized as unworthy of consideration without providing enough empirical evidence. The overall results suggest that the treatment of grammar with a ‘one –size -fits- all’ methodology instead of utilizing a balanced perspective based on the needs and context of the learners is not expected to yield sufficient result in any language teaching contexts.


Keywords


grammar teaching; context; FonFs; FonM; FonF

References


 

[1] Brown, J. D. (2001). Using surveys in language programs. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

[2] Campbell, R. (1970). An evaluation and comparison of present methods for teaching English grammar to speakers of other languages. TESOL QUARTERLY, 4/1, 37-48.
http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/3585777

[3] Borg, S. & Burns, A. (2008). Integrating grammar in adult TESOL classrooms. Applied Linguistics, 29/3, 456–482.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/applin/amn020

[4] Canagarajah, A. S. (1999). Resisting linguistic imperialism in English teaching. New York: Oxford University Press.

[5] Celce- Murcia, M. (1991). Grammar pedagogy in second and foreign language teaching, TESOL QUARTERLY, 5/3, 459-480.

[6] Cullen, R. (2008). Teaching grammar as a liberating force. ELT Journal, 62/3, 221-230.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/elt/ccm042

[7] Davies, M. (2006). Paralinguistic focus on form. TESOL QUARTERLY, 40/4, 841-850.
http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/40264316

[8] Ellis, R. (1995). Interpretation tasks for grammar teaching. TESOL QUARTERLY, 29/1, 87-105.
http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/3587806

[9] Ellis, R. (2003). Task-based language learning and teaching. Oxford; Oxford University Press.

[10] Ellis, R. (2006). Current issues in the teaching of grammar: An SLA perspective. TESOL QUARTERLY, 40/1, 157-181.
http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/40264512

[11] Ellis, R. et al. (2001). Preemptive focus on form in the ESL classroom. TESOL QUARTERLY, 35/3, 407-420.
http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/3588029

[12] Fotos, S. S. & Ellis, R. (1991). Communicating about grammar: A task-based approach. TESOL QUARTERLY, 25/4, 605-628.
http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/3587079

[13] Fotos, S. S. (1994). Integrating grammar instruction and communicative language use through grammar consciousness raising tasks. TESOL QUARTERLY, 28/2, 323-331.
http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/3587436

[14] Harmer, J. (2003). Popular culture, methods, and context. ELT Journal, 57/3, 288-294.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/elt/57.3.288

[15] Larsen-Freeman, D. (2003). Teaching language: From grammar to grammaring. Boston: Heinle & Heinle.

[16] Larsen-freeman, D. (2000). Teaching and principles in language Teaching. Oxford University Press, pp. 11-22.

[17] Laufer, B. (2005). Focus on form in second language vocabulary learning. EUROSLA, 5, 223-250.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1075/eurosla.5.11lau

[18] Laufer, B. and Girsai, N. (2008). Form-Focused instruction in second language vocabulary learning. Applied Linguistics, 29/4, 694-716.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/applin/amn018

[19] Light, T. (1968). The three dimensions of grammar for teaching English as a foreign language. TESOL, 2.4, 219-225.
http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/3585918

[20] Long, M. (1991). Focus on form: A design feature in language teaching methodology. In K. DeBot, R. Ginsberg, & C. Kramsch (Eds.), Foreign language research in cross-cultural perspective (pp. 39–52). Amsterdam: Benjamins

[21] Long, M. (1991). Focus on form: A design feature in language teaching methodology. In K. DeBot, R. Ginsberg, & C. Kramsch (Eds.), Foreign language research in cross-cultural perspective (pp. 39–52). Amsterdam: Benjamins.

[22] Nassaji, H. & Fotos, S. (2004). Current development in research on the teaching of grammar. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 24/2, 126-145.

[23] Martin, M. A. (1978). The application of spiraling to the teachers' grammar. TESOL QUARTERLY, 12/2, 151-161.
http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/3585606

[24] Brooks-Lewis, K. A. (2009). Adult Learners‘ Perceptions of the Incorporation of their L1 in Foreign Language Teaching and Learning. Applied Linguistics, 30/2, 216–235.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/applin/amn051

[25] Richards, J. C. & Rodgers, T. S. (2001). Approaches and methods in language teaching. Cambridge.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511667305

[26] Saraceni, M. (2007). Meaningful form: transitivity and intentionality. ELT Journal, 62/2, 1-9.

[27] Sheen, R. (2003). Focus on form- a myth in the making? ELT Journal, 57/3, 225-234.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/elt/57.3.225

[28] heen, R. (2006). Comments on R. Ellis‘s —Current issues in the teaching of grammar: An SLA perspective‖. TESOL Quarterly 40/4, 828–32.

[29] Swain, M., & Lapkin, S. (2001). Focus on form through collaborative dialogue: Exploring task effects. In M. Bygate, P. Skehan & M. Swain (Eds.), Researching pedagogic tasks: Second language learning, teaching and testing (pp. 99–118). Harlow, UK: Pearson Education.

[30] Tollefson, J. W. (2000). ‗Policy and ideology in the spread of English‘ in J. K. Hall and W. G. Eggington (eds): The Sociopolitics of English Language Teaching. Buffalo: Multilingual Matters Ltd.


Full Text: PDF


Theory and Practice in Language Studies (TPLS, ISSN 1799-2591)

Copyright @ 2006-2012 by ACADEMY PUBLISHER – All rights reserved.