Theory and Practice in Language Studies, Vol 2, No 7 (2012), 1465-1471, Jul 2012
doi:10.4304/tpls.2.7.1465-1471

Cooperative Learning Boosts EFL Students’ Grammar Achievement

Mohammad Reza Ghorbani, Maryam Nezamoshari’e

Abstract


It has been suggested that Cooperative Learning (CL), as a close relative of Community Language Learning (CLL), might be a good alternative to the dominant Grammar Translation Method (GTM) in Asia, where learners are believed to be individualistic, passive, and unable to work cooperatively to construct their own knowledge. Based on ten ninety-minute-long sessions, this study compared CL to GTM in north-east Iran, using an experimental design. This research investigated 64 female freshmen’s achievement on 10 grammatical forms. Thirty-two students (eight four-member groups) participated in the experimental group (CL), and the other thirty two in the control group. The same instructor (one of the researchers) taught in both classes. Using the SPSS software, a covariance test and independent samples t-tests were used to test three hypotheses. A prescribed textbook at the national level was used as the material and a thirty-item test with a reliability of 0.82 was used as the instrument. The findings suggest the superiority of CL to GTM and its being applicable in an Iranian context. Furthermore, in the CL class, the gifted students were found to improve as much as the poor ones. The study offers some implication for teachers, teacher educators, students, and theory developers.


Keywords


cooperative learning; traditional instruction; grammar and high/low-achievers

References


 

[1] Alimohammadi, M., & Khalili, H. (2008). General English. Tehran: Payame Noor University Press.

[2] Bandura, A. (1971). Social learning theory. NJ: Prentice Hall Regents.

[3] Bandura, A. (1988). Organizational application of social cognitive theory. Australian Journal of Management, 13(2), 275-302.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/031289628801300210

[4] Bandura, A. (1997). Selfefficacy: The exercise of control. New York: W. H. Freeman and Company.

[5] Behjat, F. (2011). Reading through interaction: From individualistic reading comprehension to collaboreadig. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 1(3), 239-244.
http://dx.doi.org/10.4304/tpls.1.3.239-244

[6] Brown, H. D. (2000). Principles of language learning and teaching. Fourth edition. White Plains, NY: Pearson Education.

[7] Clark, I. (2008). Collaborative learning: The cultural barrier to effective language acquisition in Japanese classrooms. Journal of English as an International Language, 3, 99-126.

[8] Cohen, P. A. & Kulik, J. A. (1981). Synthesis of research on the effects of tutoring. Research Information Research, 39, 227-229.

[9] Eslami, Z. (2010). Teachers’ voice vs. students’ voice: A needs analysis approach to English for academic purposes (EAP) in Iran. English Language Teaching, 3(1), 3-11.

[10] Farhady, H., Jafarpoor, A., & Birjandi, P. (2005). Testing language skills from theory to practice. Tehran: SAMT.

[11] Hajilari, E. (2001). A comparison between effects of cooperative and traditional learning on third-grade junior high school students' academic development. (Master's thesis, Islamic Azad University of Central Tehran, 2001). Retrieved on 8/12/11 from http://www.hawzah.net/FA/thesisview.html?ThesisID=87147

[12] Javadi Rahavard, Z. (2010). Cooperative learning strategies and reading comprehension. California Linguistic Notes, 35(2), 1-15.

[13] Johnson, D. W. & Johnson, R. T. (1999). Making cooperative learning work. Theory into Practice, 38(2), 67-73.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00405849909543834

[14] Kuo, I. (2011). Student perceptions of student interaction in a British EFL setting. ELT Journal, 65(3), 281-290.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/elt/ccq063

[15] Larsen-Freeman, D. (1997). Chaos/complexity science and second language acquisition. Applied Linguistics, 18(2), 141-165.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/applin/18.2.141

[16] Larse-Freeman, D. (2003). Techniques and principles in language teaching. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

[17] Liang, T. (2002). Implementing cooperative learning in EFL teaching: Process and effects. (Doctoral dissertation, National Taiwan Normal University, 2002). Retrieved on 2/19/12 from http://www.asian-efl-journal.com/Thesis_Liang_Tsailing.pdf

[18] Long, M. H., & Robinson, P. (1998). Focus on form: Theory, research, and practice. In C. Doughty and J. Williams (Eds.), Focus on form in classroom second language acquisition (15-42). Cambridge University Press.

[19] Momtaz, E. & Garner, M. (2010). Does collaborative learning improve EFL students’ reading comprehension? Journal of Linguistics and Language Teaching, 1(1), 15-36.

[20] Nassaji, H. & Fotos, S. (2004). Current developments in research on the teaching of grammar. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 24, 126-145.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0267190504000066

[21] Nunan, D. (2003). Practical English language teaching. New York: MC Graw-Hill.

[22] Parveen, Q., Mahmood, S. T., Mahmood, A. & Arif, M. (2011). Effect of cooperative learning on academic achievement of 8th grade students in the subject of social studies. International Journal of Academic Research, 3(1), 950-954.

[23] Prabhu, N. S. (1990). There is no best method—why? TESOL Quarterly, 24(2), 161-176.
http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/3586897

[24] Richards, J. C., & Rodgers, T. S. (2001). Approaches and methods in language teaching. Second edition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511667305

[25] Richards, J., & Schmidt, R. (2010). Longman dictionary of language teaching and applied linguistics (4th ed.). London: Longman.

[26] chmidt, R. (1990). The role of consciousness in second language learning. Applied Linguistics, 11(2), 129-158.

[27] Sharifi-Ashtiani, N. (2010). Effects of cooperative test-writing on students' learning English and their attitudes towards it. Educational Innovations, 9(34), 25-44.

[28] Swain, M. & Lapkins, S. (1995). Problems in output and the cognitive process they generate: A step towards second language learning. Applied Linguistics, 16(3), 371-391.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/applin/16.3.371

[29] Vygotsky, L. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

[30] Vygotsky, L. (1986). Thought and language. Massachusetts: MIT Press.

[31] Wang, H. M. (1992). Using cooperative learning in the EFL classroom. National Taiwan Police College Bulletin, 5, 289-312.

[32] Zarei, A. & Keshavarz, J. (2011). On the effects of tow models of cooperative learning on EFL reading comprehension and vocabulary learning. Modern Journal of Language Teaching Methods, 1(2), 39-54.

[33] Zuo, W. (2011). The effects of cooperative learning on improving college students’ reading comprehension. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 1(8), 986-989.


Full Text: PDF


Theory and Practice in Language Studies (TPLS, ISSN 1799-2591)

Copyright @ 2006-2012 by ACADEMY PUBLISHER – All rights reserved.