Theory and Practice in Language Studies, Vol 2, No 6 (2012), 1153-1159, Jun 2012
doi:10.4304/tpls.2.6.1153-1159

A Comparison of Productive Vocabulary in Chinese and American Advanced English Learners’ Academic Writings

Xixiang Lou, Guanghui Ma

Abstract


A comparison has been made of productive vocabulary in some normal university English majors’ theses in China and American final-year undergraduates’ papers. The research demonstrates that with family as the measurement unit, Chinese students proportionally use fewer words of the 1st, 8th to 10th 1000 frequency level words than American students, while in terms of the 2nd to 4th 1000 frequency band words, Chinese students use more than American students and there is no difference in the usage of the words of the rest word lists. In terms of lexical words complexity: American students repeatedly use the 1st 1000 high-frequency words in a higher proportion, use more inflectional forms than Chinese students but use fewer derivational forms than Chinese students. Chinese students use the 2nd 1000 frequency band words repeatedly in a greater proportion than American students; use more inflectional and derivational forms than American students. Chinese students use low-frequency words repeatedly in a greater proportion, more inflectional forms, but use the derivational forms in the same proportion as American students.


Keywords


productive vocabulary; richness; lexical word complexity

References


 

[1] Daller, H., Milton, J., & Treffers-Daller, J. (2007). Editor's introduction. In H. Daller, J. Milton & J. Treffers-Daller (Eds.), Modelling and Assessing Vocabulary Knowledge. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

[2] Heatley, A., Nation, I.S.P. and Coxhead, A. (2002). RANGE and FREQUENCY programs. http://www.vuw.ac.nz/lals/staff/Paul_Nation (accessed 10/2/2011).

[3] Henriksen, B. (1999). Three Dimensions of Vocabulary Development. SSLA, 21, 03–317.

[4] Laufer, B. (1994). The Lexical Profile fo Second Language Writing: Does it Change over Time?. RELC Journal, 25(2), 21-33
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/003368829402500202

[5] Laufer, B. (1995). Beyond 2000: a Measure of Productive Lexicon in a Second Language. In L. Eubank, L. Selinker & M. Sharwood-Smith (Eds.), The Current State of Interlanguage: Studies in Honor of William E. Rutherford (pp. 265-272). Amsterdam John Benjamins Pub Co.

[6] Laufer, B. (1998). The Development of Passive and Active Vocabulary in a Second Language: Same or Different?. Applied Linguistic, 19(2), 255-227I
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/applin/19.2.255

[7] Laufer, B., & Nation, P. (1995). Vocabulary Size and Use: Lexical Richness in L2 Written Production. Applied Linguistics, 16(3), 307-321.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/applin/16.3.307

[8] Laufer, B., & Nation, P. (1999) . A Vocabulary-size Test of Controlled Productive Ability. Language Testing, 16 (1), 33-51.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/026553229901600103

[9] Leńko-Szymańska, A. (2009). How to Trace the Growth in Learners' Active Vocabulary? A Corpus-based Study. In B. Kettemann & G. Marko (Eds.), Teaching and Learning by Doing Corpus Analysis. Beijing: World Publishing Corporation.

[10] Nation, I. S. P. (2001). Learning Vocabulary in Another Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

[11] Nation, I. S. P., & Webb, S. (2010). Researching and Analyzing Vocabulary. Boston: Sherrise Roehr.

[12] Webb, S. (2008). Receptive and Productive Vocabulary Sizes of L2 Learners. SSLA 30 79-95.

[13] Webb, S. (2009). The Effects of Receptive and Productive Learning of Word Pairs on Vocabulary Knowledge. Regional Language Centre Journal 40(3), 360-376.

[14] Bao G. (2008). A Survey of the Development of Lexical Richness in L2 Compositions from a Multidimensional Perspective. Computer-assisted Foreign Language Education in China (123), 38-44.

[15] Gui L. (2010). A Contrastive Study of Lexical Proficiency between L1 and L2 Compositions via Computerized Assessment. Foreign Language Teaching and Research (bimonthly), 42 (6), 445-450.

[16] Li Y., & Shen J.H. (2009). A Study of Productive Vocabulary of First-year Non-English Majors. Foreign Language Research (3), 117-120.

[17] Li Z.X., & Li J.Q. (2005). An Empirical Study on the Productive Vocabulary of Advanced Chinese EFL Learners—Based on A Contrastive Analysis of Model Compositions of Advanced Chinese EFL Learners and American University Students. Shandong Foreign Languages Teaching Journal (5), 56-59.

[18] Lu M. (2008). The Developmental Characteristics of the Productive Vocabulary Breadth: A Research based on English Majors' Written Materials. Foreign Language Learning Theory and Practice (2), 10-15.

[19] Read, J. (2000). Assessing Vocabulary. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511732942

[20] Tan X.C. (2006). A study of Chinese English learners’ productive vocabulary development. Foreign Language Teaching and Research (bimonthly), 38(3), 202-207.

[21] Tan X.C. (2007). A Study of English Learners Development of In-depth Knowledge on Productive Vocabulary. Foreign Language Education, 28(2), 52-56.

[22] Thornbury, S. (2002). How to Teach Vocabulary. Harlow: Pearson ESL.

[23] Wan L.F. (2010). An Empirical Investigation into Lexical diversity of Chinese English Majors TEM Writings. Foreign Language World (1), 40-46.

[24] WARING, R. (2002). Scales of Vocabulary Knowledge in Second Language Vocabulary Assessment Retrieved 5th Oct., 2011, from http://www.robwaring.org/papers/various/scales.htm

[25] Wen Q.F., Ding Y.R., & Wang W.Y. (2003). Features of Oral Style in English Compositions of Advanced Chinese EFL learners: An Exploratory Study by Contrastive Learner Corpus Analysis. Foreign Language Teaching and Research (bimonthly), 35(4), 268-274.


Full Text: PDF


Theory and Practice in Language Studies (TPLS, ISSN 1799-2591)

Copyright @ 2006-2014 by ACADEMY PUBLISHER – All rights reserved.