Comprehending a Non-text: A Study of Gender-based Differences in EFL Reading Comprehension

Abstract

[1] Abu-Rabia, S. (2004). Teachers’ role, learners’ gender differences, and FL anxiety among seventh grade students studying English as a FL. Educational Psychology, 24(5), 711-721.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/0144341042000263006

[2] Afflerbach, P. (1990a). The influence of prior knowledge and text genre on readers' prediction strategies. Journal of Reading Behavior, 22(2), 131-48.

[3] Afflerbach, P. (1990b). The influence of prior knowledge on expert readers’ main ideas construction. Reading Research Quarterly, 25 (1), 31-46.
http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/747986

[4] Alderson, J. C. (2000). Assessing reading. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511732935

[5] Alexander, P.A., & T.L. Jetton. 2000. Learning from text: A multidimensional and developmental perspective. In M. L. Kamil, P. B. Mosenthal, P. D. Pearson, & R. Barr, (Eds.), Handbook of reading research: Vol. 3, (pp.285–310). Mahwah, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum.

[6] Alptekin, C. (2006). Cultural familiarity in inferential and literal comprehension in L2 reading. System, 34, 494–508.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2006.05.003

[7] Al-Shumaimeri. Y. A. N (2005). Gender Differences in Reading Comprehension Performance in in relation to content familiarity of gender-neutral texts. Paper presented at the The second international conference: Language, culture and literature, Minia University, Eygept.

[8] Anderson, N. J. (1999). Exploring second language reading. Boston, MA: Heinle & Heinle.

[9] Anderson, N. J., Bachman, L., Perkins, K., & Cohen, A. (1991). An exploratory study into the construct validity of a reading comprehension test: Triangulation of data scores. Language Testing, 8, 41-66.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/026553229100800104

[10] Anderson, N. J. (1991). Individual differences in strategy use in second language reading and testing. The Modern Language Journal, 75(4), 460–472.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.1991.tb05384.x

[11] Anderson, R. C., & Pearson, P. D. (1984). A schema-theoretic view of reading comprehension. In P. D. Pearson (Ed.), Handbook of reading research (pp. 255-291). New York: Longman.

[12] Armand, F. (2001). Learning from expository texts: Effects of the interaction of prior knowledge and test structure on responses to different question types. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 16, 67–86.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF03172995

[13] Arnold, J. (1995a). Reference, verbal form, and information structure in Mapudungun. Paper presented at the Meeting for the Society for the Study of Indigenous Languages of America, Albuquerque, NM.

[14] Arnold, J. (1995b). The roles of context and surface information in pronoun disambiguation. Qualifying Paper, Stanford University.

[15] Bacon, S. M. (1992). The relationship between gender, comprehension, processing strategies, and cognitive and affective response in foreign language listening. Modern Language Journal, 76, 161-178.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.1992.tb01096.x

[16] Barnett, M.A. (1988). Reading through context: How real and perceived strategy use affects FL comprehension. The Modern Language Journal, 72, 150-162.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.1988.tb04177.x

[17] Bernhardt, E. B. (1991). Reading development in a second-language. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.

[18] Bolger, N., & Kellaghan, T. (1990). Method of measurement and gender differences in scholastic achievement. Journal of Educational Measurement, 27, 165-174.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-3984.1990.tb00740.x

[19] Brandao, A. C. P. & Oakhill, J. (2005). How do you know this answer? Children’s use of text data and general knowledge in story comprehension. Reading and Writing,18, 687–713. DOI 10.1007/s11145-005-5600-x
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11145-005-5600-x

[20] Brantmeier, C. (2001). Second language reading research on passage content and gender: Challenges for the intermediate-level curriculum. Foreign Language Annals, 34(4), 325-333.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1944-9720.2001.tb02064.x

[21] Brantmeier, C. (2002). Second language reading strategy research at the secondary university levels: Variations, disparities, and generalizability. The Reading Matrix, 2(3), 1–14

[22] Brantmeier, C. (2003). Does gender make a difference? Passage content and comprehension in second language reading. Reading in a Foreign Language, 15 (1), 10-27.

[23] Brantmeier, C. (2004). Building a comprehensive theory of adult foreign language reading: A variety of variables and research methods. The Southern Journal of Linguistics, 27, 1–7.

[24] Bugel, K. & Buunk, B. P. (1996). Sex differences in foreign language text comprehension: The role of interests and prior knowledge. The Modern Language Journal, 80, 15–31.

[25] Caramazza, A. & Gupta, S. (1979). The roles of topicalization, parallel function and verb semantics in the interpretation of pronouns. Linguistics, 3, 497-518.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/ling.1979.17.5-6.497

[26] Carrell, P. L. (1987). Content and formal schemata in ESL reading. TESOL Quarterly, 21, 461–481.
http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/3586498

[27] Carrell, P. L. (1988). Some causes of text-boundedness and schema interference in ESL reading. In P. L. Carrell, J. Devine, & D. Esky (Eds.), Interactive approaches to second language reading (pp. 101–113). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

[28] Carrell, P. L., Devine, J., & Eskey, D. E. (1988). Interactive approaches to second language reading. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

[29] Carlton, S. T. & Harris, A. M. (1992). Characteristics associated with differential item functioning on the scholastic aptitude test: gender and majority/minority group comparisons. ETS Research Report, 64-92.

[30] Chavez, M. (2001). Gender in the language classroom. New York: McGraw Hill.

[31] Cole, N. S. (1997). The ETS gender study: How males and females perform in educational settings. Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service.

[32] Connell, D., & Gunzelmann, B. (2004, March). The next gender gap: why are so many boys floundering while so many girls are soaring? Instructor, March, 14-17.

[33] Donin, J. Graves, B. & Goyette, E. (2004). Second language text comprehension: Processing within a multilayered system. The Canadian Modern Language Review,61(1), 53-76.

[34] Ehrlich, M. F. (1990). The processing of cohesion devices in text comprehension. Psychological Research, 53, 169-174.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF01371825
PMid:1946877

[35] Ellis, N. C. (2001). Memory for language. In P. Robinson (Ed.), Cognition and second language instruction (pp. 33–68). Cambridge: Cambridge University press.

[36] Erten, I., H., & & Razı, S. (2009). The effects of cultural familiarity on reading comprehension. Reading in a Foreign Language, 21(1), 60–77.

[37] Fincher-Kiefer, R. (1992). The role of prior knowledge in inferential processing. Journal of Research in Reading, 15(1), 12-27.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9817.1992.tb00018.x

[38] Fincher-Kiefer, R., Post, T.A., Greene, T.R., & Voss, J.F. (1988). On the role of prior knowledge and task demands in the processing of text. Journal of Memory and Language, 27, 416-428.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0749-596X(88)90065-4

[39] Fukkink, R. G., Hulstijn, J., & Simis, A. (2005). Does training in second-language word recognition skills affect reading comprehension? An experimental study. The Modern Language Journal, 89 (1), 54-75.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.0026-7902.2005.00265.x

[40] Gernsbacher, M. A. & Hargreaves, D. (1988). Accessing sentence participants: The advantage of first mention. Journal of Memory and Language, 26, 69-83.

[41] Grabe, W. (1991). Current developments in second language reading research. TESOL Quarterly, 25, 375–406.
http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/3586977

[42] Grabe, W., & Stoller, F. L. (2002). Teaching and researching reading. London: Longman.

[43] Hyde, J., & Linn, M. (1988). Gender differences in verbal ability: a meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 104 (1), 53-69.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.104.1.53

[44] Johnson, P. (1981). Effects on reading comprehension of language complexity and cultural background of a text. TESOL Quarterly, 15, 169–181.
http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/3586408

[45] Kaylani, C. (1996). The influences of gender and motivation on EFL learning strategy use in Jordan. In R. Oxford (Ed.), Language learning strategies around the world: crosscultural perspectives (pp. 75-88). Honolulu: University of Hawaii, Second Language Teaching and Curriculum Center.

[46] Keshavarz, M. H., Atai, M. R., & Ahmadi, H. (2007). Content schemata, linguistic simplification, and EFL readers’ comprehension and recall. Reading in a Foreign Language, 19 (1), 19–33.

[47] Kintsch, W. (1994) Text comprehension, memory, and learning. American Psychologist, 49, 294-303.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.49.4.294
PMid:8203801

[48] Kintsch, W. (1998). Comprehension: A paradigm for cognition. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.

[49] Koda, K. (2005). Insights into second language reading: a cross-linguistic approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

[50] Koda, K. (2007). Reading and language learning: Crosslinguistic constraints on second language reading development. Language Learning, 57(Suppl. 1), 1–44.

[51] Kozminsky, E., & Kozminsky, L. (2001). How do general knowledge and reading strategies ability relate to reading comprehension of high school students at different educational levels? Journal of Research in Reading, 24 (2), 187-204.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1467-9817.00141

[52] Kuno, S. (1976). Subject, theme, and the speaker's empathy - A reexamination of relativization phenomena. In C. Li (Ed.), Subject and Topic (pp. 419–444). New York: Academic press.

[53] Linn, M. C., De Benedictis, T., Delucchi, K., Harris, A., & Stage, E. (1987). Gender differences in national assessment of educational progress science items: what does “don’t know” really mean? Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 24(3), 267-78.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/tea.3660240307

[54] Mazzeo, J., Schmitt, A. P., & Bleistein, C. A. (1993). Sex-related performance differences on constructed-response and multiple-choice sections of Advanced Placement Examinations. College Board Report, No. 92-7; ETS Research Report No. 93-5. New York: College Entrance Examination Board.

[55] McKenna, M.C., Kear, D.J., & Ellsworth, R. A. (1995). Children’s attitudes toward reading: A national survey. Reading Research Quarterly, 30(4), 934–956.
http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/748205

[56] McNamara, D. S. (2001). Reading both high-coherence and low-coherence texts: Effects of text sequence and prior knowledge. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology, 55, 51–62.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/h0087352

[57] McNamara, D.S., & Kintsch, W. (1996). Learning from texts: Effects of prior knowledge and text coherence. Discourse Processes, 23, 247–288.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01638539609544975

[58] Myers, D. G. (2002). Social psychology (7th ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.

[59] Nassaji, H. (2002). Schema theory and knowledge-based processes in second language reading comprehension: A need for alternative perspectives. Language Learning, 52, 439–481.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/0023-8333.00189

[60] Oxford, R. L., Felkins, R. Z., Hollaway, G., & Saleh, A. (1996). Telling their stories: language learners use diaries and recollective studies. In R. Oxford (Ed.), Language learning strategies around the world: cross-cultural perspectives (pp. 19-34). Honolulu:University of Hawaii, Second Language Teaching and Curriculum Center.

[61] Oxford, R. L., Park-Oh, Y., Ito, I., Sumrall, M. (1993). Learning a language by satellite: What influences achievement. System, 21, 31-48.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0346-251X(93)90005-2

[62] Pae, T. (2004). Gender effect on reading comprehension with Korean EFL learners. System, 32(3), 265-281.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2003.09.009

[63] Palincsar, A. S., & Brown, A. L. (1984). Reciprocal teaching of comprehension-fostering and monitoring activities. Cognition & Instruction, 1, 117–175.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1207/s1532690xci0102_1

[64] Pearson, P. D., & Fielding, L. (1991). Comprehension instruction. In R. Barr, M. L. Kamil, P. Mosenthal, & P. D. Pearson (Eds.), Handbook of reading research (pp. 815–860). White Plains, NY: Longman.

[65] Perfetti, C. A., Landi, N., & Oakhill, J. (2005). The acquisition of reading comprehension skill. In Margaret Snowling and Charles Hulme (eds.), The Science of Reading: A Handbook, (227–247). Malden: Blackwell.

[66] Pressley, M. (2000). What should comprehension instruction be the instruction of? In M. L., Kamil, P. B., Mosenthal, & P. D., Pearson (Eds.), Handbook of reading research (pp. 545–561). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

[67] Pressley, M., Wharton-McDonald, R., Mistretta-Hampton, J. M., & Echevarria, M. (1998). The nature of literacy instruction in ten grade 4/5 classrooms in upstate New York. Scientific Studies of Reading, 2, 159–194.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1207/s1532799xssr0202_4

[68] Prestin, E. (2008). Writing and reading. In G. Rickheit and H. Strohner (Eds), Handbook of Communication Competence (pp. 225-256). Mouton de Gruyter: Walter de Gruyter GmbH & Co. KG, Berlin.

[69] Pulido, D. (2004). The effects of cultural familiarity on incidental vocabulary acquisition through reading. The Reading Matrix, 4(2), 20–53.

[70] Rosén, M. (2001). Gender differences in reading performance on documents across countries. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 14(1), 1-38.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/A:1007995107442

[71] Rumelhart, D.E. (1980). Schemata: the building blocks of cognition. In R.J., Spiro, B.C., Bruce & W.F. Brewer (eds.) Theoretical Issues in Reading Comprehension (pp. 33-58). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

[72] Salmero’n, L., Kintsch, W., & Can˜as, J. J. (2006). Reading strategies and prior knowledge in learning from hypertext. Memory and Cognition, 34, 1157–1171.
http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/BF03193262

[73] Sarig, G. (1987). High level reading in the first and the foreign language: Some comparative process data. In J. Devine, P. Carrell & D. Eskey (Eds.), Research in reading English as a second language (pp. 105–120). Washington: TESOL.

[74] Sheldon, A. (1974), The role of parallel function in the acquisition of relative clauses in English. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 13, 272–81.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0022-5371(74)80064-2

[75] Sheorey, R. (1999). An examination of language learning strategy use in the setting of an indigenized variety of English. System, 27, 173-190.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0346-251X(99)00015-9

[76] Singhal, M. (2001). Reading proficiency, reading strategies, metacognitive awareness and FL readers. The Reading Matrix, 1(1), 1–10.

[77] Smith, M.W., & Wilhelm, J. D. (2002). Reading don’t fix no Chevy’s: literacy in the lives of young men. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.

[78] Stevenson, R. J., Crawley, R. A., & Kleinman, D. (1994). Thematic Roles, Focus and the Representation of Events. Language and Cognitive Processes, 9(4), 473-592.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01690969408402130

[79] Swaffar, J., Arens, K., & Byrnes, H. (1991). Reading for meaning: An integrated approach to language learning. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.

[80] Van den Broek, P., Rapp, D. N., & Kendeou, P. (2005). Integrating memory-based and constructionist processes in accounts of reading comprehension. Discourse Processes, 39, 299–316.

[81] Van Oostendorp, H. (1991). Inferences and integrations made by readers of script-based texts, Journal of Research in Reading, 14(1), 3-20.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9817.1991.tb00002.x

[82] Voss, J. F., Vesonder, G.T., & Spilich, G. J. (1980). Text generation and recall by high knowledge and low-knowledge individuals. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 19, 651–667.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0022-5371(80)90343-6

[83] Wei (2009). Gender differences in reading comprehension for Chinese secondary school students. A Seminar Paper Presented to the Graduate Faculty; University of Wisconsin-Platteville.

[84] Werner, P. K., & Nelson, J. P. (2007). Mosaic 2: grammar. New York: McGraw-hill.

[85] Yongqi, G. (2002). Gender, academic major, and vocabulary learning strategies of Chinese EFL learners. RELC Journal, 33(1), 35-54.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/003368820203300102