Journal of Language Teaching and Research, Vol 3, No 1 (2012), 188-199, Jan 2012
doi:10.4304/jltr.3.1.188-199

The Effects of Explicit/Implicit Instruction and Feedback on the Development of Persian EFL Learners‟ Pragmatic Competence in Suggestion Structures

Azin Salemi, Mitra Rabiee, Saeed Ketabi

Abstract


To date, a number of studies have investigated the speech act of suggestion. However, most of these studies have focused on the production – a sociolinguistic perspective – rather than the acquisition of this speech act. The study reported in this article aimed to compare the effects of implicit versus explicit instruction and feedback in the development of pragmatic competence of Iranian EFL learners of English in terms of the speech act of suggestion. The participants of this study consisted of 100 intermediate EFL learners of English who were randomly assigned to four experimental groups and a control group. Each experimental group participated in two twenty-minute successive sessions. The first experimental group received explicit instruction and explicit feedbacks, the second experimental group received explicit instruction and implicit feedbacks and the remaining two experimental groups were taught using implicit-explicit and implicit-implicit instruction and feedbacks, respectively. Data were collected using an immediate post-test as well as a delayed post-test which was administered a month after the post-test. Results of the study showed that the explicit-explicit method of instruction has a much better influence on Persian EFL learners. However, the results also demonstrated that the students tend to forget the instructed materials after four weeks. It follows from the results of this study that the development of pragmatic competence in terms of suggestion speech act is a complex process which proceeds in a non-linear fashion.


Keywords


interlanguage pragmatics; explicit instruction; implicit instruction; explicit feedback; implicit feedback; focus on form; focus on forms; suggestion

References


Alcon, E. (2007). Incidental focus on form, noticing and vocabulary learning in EFL classroom. International Journal of English Studies, 7, 41-60.

Bardovi-Harlig, K. (2001). Evaluating the empirical evidence: Grounds for instruction in pragmatics? In K. Rose & G. Kasper (Eds.), Pragmatics in language teaching (pp. 13-32). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Bardovi-Harlig, K., & Mahan-Taylor, R. (2003). Teaching pragmatics. Washington, DC: United States Department of State.

Billmyer, K. (1990). I really like your lifestyle: ESL learners learning how to compliment. Penn Working Papers in Educational Linguistics, 6(2), 31-48.

Bouton, L. F. (1994a). Can NNS skill in interpreting implicatures in American English be improved through explicit instruction? A pilot study. In L. F. Bouton & Y. Kachru (Eds.), Pragmatics and language learning, (Vol 5, pp. 88-109). University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign: Division of English as an International Language.

Bouton, L. F. (1994b). Conversational implicature in a second language: Learned slowly when not deliberately taught. Journal of Pragmatics, 22, 157-167.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0378-2166(94)90065-5

Boxer, D., & Pickering, L. (1995). Problems in the presentation of speech acts in ELT materials: The case of complaints. ELT Journal, 49, 44-58.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/elt/49.1.44

Doughty, C. (2003). Instructed SLA: Constraints, compensation, and enhancement. In C. Doughty & M. H. Long (Eds.), Handbook of second language acquisition. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/9780470756492.ch10

Eslami-Rasekh, Z., Eslami-Rasekh, A., & Fatahi, A. (2004). The effect of explicit metalinguistic instruction on the speech act awareness of advanced EFL students. TESL-EJ 8(2), 1-12.

Fukuya, Y.J., Reeve, M., Gisi, J., Christianson, M., (1998). Does focus on form work for teaching sociopragmatics? 12th International Conference on Pragmatics and Language Learning, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign.

House, J., (1996). Developing pragmatic fluency in English as a foreign language: Routines and metapragmatic awareness. Studies in Second Language Acquisition.18, 225–252.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0272263100014893

Jiang, X. (2006). Suggestions: What should ESL students know? System, 34, 36–54.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2005.02.003

Kasper, G. (1996a). Introduction: Interlanguage pragmatics in SLA. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 18, 145-148.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0272263100014856

Kasper, G. (1996b). Developmental issues in interlanguage pragmatics. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, (18), 149–169.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0272263100014868

Kasper, G. (1997). Can pragmatic competence be taught? Second Language Teaching & Curriculum Center. Honolulu: University of Hawaii.

Kasper, G. (2001). Classroom research in interlanguage pragmatics. In K. Rose & G. Kasper (Eds.), Pragmatics in language teaching (pp. 33-60). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Kasper, G., Rose, K.R. (2002). Pragmatic development in a second language. A Supplement to Language Learning, 52, (suppl. 1). Blackwell, Mahwah, NJ

Koester, A. J. (2002). The performance of speech acts in workplace conversations and the teaching of communicative functions. System 30, 167–184.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0346-251X(02)00003-9

Koike, D., (1989). Pragmatic competence and adult L2 acquisition: speech acts and interlanguage. Modern Language Journal 73 (3), 279–289.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.1989.tb06364.x

Koike, D. (1995). Transfer of pragmatic competence and suggestions in Spanish foreign language learning. In: S. Gass, & J. Neu (Eds.), Speech Acts across Cultures (pp. 257–281). Mouton de Gruyter, Berlin.

Koike, D., & Pearson, L. (2005). The effect of instruction and feedback in the development of pragmatic competence. System, 33, 481-501.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2005.06.008

Kondo, S. (2001). Instructional effects on pragmatic development: refusal by Japanese EFL learners. Publications of Akenohoshi Women’s Junior College 19, 33-51.

Kondo, S. (2004). Raising pragmatic awareness in the EFL context. Sophia Junior College Faculty Bulletin, 24, 4972.

Kubota, M. (1995). Teachability of conversational implicature to Japanese EFL learners. The Institute for Research in Language Teaching Bulletin 9, 35-67.

Leowen, S. (2005). Incidental focus on form and second language learning. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 27, 361-386.

LePair, R. (1996). Spanish request strategies: a cross-cultural analysis from an intercultural perspective. Language Sciences 18 (3–4), 651–670.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0388-0001(96)00040-X

Liddicoat, A. J., & Crozet, C. (2001). Acquiring French interactional norms through instruction. In: K. R. Rose & G. Kasper (Eds.), Pragmatics in Language Teaching (pp. 125-144). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

LoCastro, V. (2000). Evidence of accommodation to L2 pragmatic norms in peer review tasks of Japanese learners of English. JALT Journal. 23, (1), 6-30.

Long, M. (1991). Focus on form: a design feature in language teaching methodology. In R. Coste & C. Kramsch (Eds.), Foreign language research in cross-cultural perspectives (pp. 39-52). Amsterdam: John Benjamin.

Lyster, R. (1994). The effect of functional-analytic teaching on aspects of French immersion students‟ sociolinguistic competence. Applied Linguistics 15(3), 263-287.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/applin/15.3.263

Martínez-Flor, A., Usó, E., Fernández, A. (Eds.). (2003). Pragmatic competence and foreign language teaching. Castellón: Servei de Publicacions de la Universitat Jaume I.

McCarthy, M. J. (1998). Spoken language and applied linguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Mir, M. (1992). Do we all apologize the same? – An empirical study on the act of apologizing by Spanish speakers learning

Norris, J., & Ortega, L. (2000). Effectiveness of L2 instruction: a research synthesis and quantitative metaanalysis. Language Learning 50(3), 417-528.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/0023-8333.00136

Olshtain, E., & Cohen. A. D. (1990). The learning of complex speech act behavior. TESL Canada Journal, 7, 45-65.

Pearson, E. (1986). Agreement/disagreement: an example of results of discourse analysis applied to the oral English classroom. International Review of Applied Linguistics 74, 47-61.

Rose, K. R., & Kasper, G. (Eds.). (2001). Pragmatics in language teaching. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Rose, K. R., & Ng, K. C. (2001). Inductive and deductive teaching of compliments and compliment responses. In K. R. Rose, & G. Kasper (Eds.), Pragmatics in language teaching (pp. 145-170). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Safont, M. P. (2003). Instructional effects on the use of request acts modification devices by EFL learners. In A. Martinez-Flor, E. Uso, & A. Fernandez, A. (Eds.), Pragmatic competence and foreign language teaching (pp. 211-232). Castellon, Spain: Servei de Publicacions de la Universitat Jaume I.

Safont, M. P. (2004). An analysis on EAP learners‟ pragmatic production: a focus on request forms. Ibérica 8, 23-39.

Safont, M. P. (2005). Third language learners: Pragmatic production and awareness. Clevedon, UK: Multilingual Matters.

Salazar, P. C. (2003). Pragmatic instruction in the EFL context. In Martinez-Flor, A., Uso, E., Fernandez, A. (Eds.), Pragmatic competence and foreign language teaching (pp. 233-246). Castellon, Spain: Servei de Publicacions de la Universitat Jaume I.

Schmidt, R. W. (1993). Consciousness, learning, and interlanguage pragmatics. In G. Kasper & S. Blum-Kulka (Eds.), Interlanguage pragmatics (pp. 21-42). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Scotton, C. M., & Bernsten, J. (1988). Natural conversations as a model for textbook dialogue. Applied Linguistics 9(4), 372-384.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/applin/9.4.372

Stalnaker, R. C. (1972). Pragmatics. In D. Davidson & G. Harman (Eds.), Semantics of natural language (pp. 380-397). Dordrecht: Reidel.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-94-010-2557-7_11

Takahashi, S. (2001). The role of input enhancement in developing pragmatic competence. In K. R. Rose & G. Kasper (Eds.), Pragmatics in language teaching (pp. 171–199). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Tateyama, Y. (2001). Explicit and implicit teaching of pragmatic routines. In K. R. Rose, & G. Kasper (Eds.), Pragmatics in language teaching (pp. 200-222). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Tateyama, Y., Kasper, G., Mui, L.P., Tay, H., Thananart, O., (1997). Explicit and implicit teaching of Japanese pragmatics routines. In: Bouton, L. (Ed.), Pragmatics and Language Learning (Vol. 8, pp. 163-177). University of Illinois: Urbana- Champaign.

Tolli, A. P. & Schmidt, A. M. (2008). The role of feedback, causal attributions, and self-efficacy in goal revision. Journal of Applied Psychology, 93, 692-701.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.93.3.692
PMid:18457497

Trosborg, A. (2003). The teaching of business pragmatics. In Martinez-Flor, A., Uso, E., Fernandez, A. (Eds.), Pragmatic competence and foreign language teaching (pp. 247-281). Castellon, Spain: Servei de Publicacions de la Universitat Jaume I.

Wildner-Bassett, M. (1994). Intercultural pragmatics and proficiency: „Polite‟ noises for cultural appropriateness. International Review of Applied Linguistics 32(1), 5-17.

Wishnoff, R. J. (2000). Hedging your bets: L2 learners‟ acquisition of pragmatic devices in academic writing and computer-mediated discourse. Second Language Studies 19, 119-157.

Yoshimi, D.R. (2001). Explicit instruction and JFL learner‟s use of interactional discourse markers. In: Rose, K.R., Kasper, G. (Eds.), Pragmatics in Language Teaching (pp. 223–244). Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.


Full Text: PDF


Journal of Language Teaching and Research (JLTR, ISSN 1798-4769)

Copyright @ 2006-2012 by ACADEMY PUBLISHER – All rights reserved.