Journal of Language Teaching and Research, Vol 3, No 1 (2012), 159-165, Jan 2012
doi:10.4304/jltr.3.1.159-165

Form-focused Instruction: A New Interpretation of TBLT in Iranian EFL Setting

Mojgan Rashtchi, Arshya Keyvanfar

Abstract


Task-based language teaching (TBLT) with its emphasis on the application of meaningful tasks seemingly undermines the importance of teaching language forms to the extent that many teachers and learners around the globe have come to believe that TBLT is the easy way out of the maze of English language learning. Nevertheless, a close inspection of the practical aspects of the approach may prove otherwise. The researchers of the present study have investigated the applicability of TBLT in the Iranian setting where English is taught as a foreign language (EFL). In so doing, a 15-item questionnaire with two versions for EFL learners and teachers was developed in Farsi by the researchers based on the one used by Schulz (2001). It was administered to 145 learners and 36 teachers in a language school in Tehran, Iran. Based on the findings it could be concluded that ELT in Iran is not fully compatible with TBLT and form-focused instruction which includes both Focus on Form as well as Focus on FormS is more promising in the EFL setting of Iran.


Keywords


form-focused instruction; Iranian EFL setting; real-life tasks; TBLT

References


Breen, M. (1987). Learner contributions to task design. In C. Candlin & D. Murphy (Eds.), Language Learning Tasks (pp. 5-22). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

Doughty, C., & Williams, J. (1998). Issues and terminology. In C. Doughty & J. Williams (Eds.), Focus on form in classroom second language acquisition (1-13). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Foster, P. (1999). Key concepts in ELT: Task-based learning and pedagogy. ELT Journal, 53 (1), 149-156.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/elt/53.1.69

Izumi, S. (2002). Focus on form in English language teaching: Integrating meaning and form ASTE, 46. Retrieved November 2, 2008, from http://www.bun-eido.co.jp/aste46.html

Krashen, S. (1981). Second language acquisition and second language learning. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Krashen, S. (1985). The input hypothesis. London: Longman.

Krashen, S. (1994). The input hypothesis and its rivals. In N. Ellis (Ed.), Implicit and explicit learning of languages (pp. 45-77). London: Academic Press.

Krashen, S., & Terrel T. (1983). The Natural Approach: Language acquisition in the classroom. Oxford: Pergamon.

Larsen-Freeman, D. (2000). Techniques and principles in language teaching. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Long, M. H. (1991). Does second language instruction make a difference? A review of the research. TESOL Quarterly, 17 (3), 359-382.
http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/3586253

Long, M. H. (1996). The role of the linguistic environment in second language acquisition. In W. Ritchie & T. Bhatia (Eds.), Handbook of second language acquisition (pp. 413-468). San Diego: Academic Press.

Long, M. H. (1997). Focus on form in task-based language teaching. Paper Presented at the Fourth Annual McGraw-Hill Satellite Conference. Retrieved March 8, 2009 from http://www.mhhe.com/socscience/foreignlang/conf/task1.htm

Long, M. H., & Robinson, P. (1998). Focus on form: Theory, research, and practice. In C. Doughty & J. Williams (Eds.), Focus on form in classroom in second language acquisition (15-42). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Nassaji, H. (1999). Towards integrating form-focused instruction and communicative interaction in the second language classroom: Some pedagogical possibilities. Canadian Modem Language Review, 55 (3). Retrieved November 22, 2008, from http://www.utpjoumals.com/product/cmlr/553/553-Nassaji.html

Nunan, D. (2006). Task-based language teaching in the Asia context: Defining 'task' Asian EFL Journal 8 (3). Retrieved December, 15, 2007 from http://www.asian-efl-journal.com/september_06_home.php

Poole, A. (2005). Focus on form instruction: Foundations, applications and criticisms. The Reading Matrix, 5(1), 47-56.

Prabhu, N. S. (1987). Second language pedagogy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Richards, J. C., & Schmidt, R. (2002). Longman dictionary of language teaching and applied linguistic. London: Pierson Education.

Schulz, R. A. (2001). Cultural differences in students and teacher perceptions concerning the role of grammar instruction and corrective feedback: US-Colombia’. The Modern Language Journal, 85(2), 244-258.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/0026-7902.00107

Skehan, P. (1998). Task-based instruction. In W. Grabe, et al, (Eds.), Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 18 (pp. 268-286). Foundations of second language teaching. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Spada, N. (1997). Form-focused instruction and second language acquisition: A review of classroom and laboratory research. Language Teaching Journal, 30, 73-87.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0261444800012799

Swain, M. (1985). Communicative competence: Some roles of comprehensible input and comprehensible output in its development. In S. Gass & C. Madden (Eds.), Input in second language acquisition (pp. 235-253). Rowley, Mass.: Newbury House.

Wilkins, D. A. (1976). Notional syllabuses. Oxford: Oxford University Press.


Full Text: PDF


Journal of Language Teaching and Research (JLTR, ISSN 1798-4769)

Copyright @ 2006-2012 by ACADEMY PUBLISHER – All rights reserved.