The Effect of Written Corrective Feedback on EFL Learners’ Performance after Collaborative Output

Abstract

Carrol, S. (1996). The irrelevance of verbal feedback to language learning. In L. Eubank, L. Selinker & M. Sharwood Smith (Eds.), The current state of interlanguage (pp.73-88). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

Carroll, S., & Swain, M. (1993). Explicit and implicit negative feedback: An empirical study of the learning of linguistic generalizations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Carroll, S., Roberge, Y., & Swain, M. (1992). The role of feedback in second language acquisition: Error correction and morphological generalization. Applied Psycholinguistics, 13, 173-198.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0142716400005555

Chandler, J. (2003).The efficacy of various kinds of error feedback for improvement in the accuracy and fluency of L2 student writing. Journal of Second Language Writing, 12(3), 267-296.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1060-3743(03)00038-9

Chaudron, C. (1977). A descriptive model of discourse in the corrective treatment of learners’ errors. Language Learning, 27, 29-46.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-1770.1977.tb00290.x

Chun, A., Day, R. R., Chenoweth, A., & Luppescu, S. (1982). Errors, interaction, and correction: A study of native-nonnative conversation. TESOL Quarterly, 16, 537-547.
http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/3586471

Dekeyser, R. (1993). The effect of error correction on L2 grammar knowledge and oral proficiency. Modern Language Journal, 77, 501-514.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.1993.tb01999.x

Doughty, C. (1994). Fine-tuning of feedback by competent speakers to language learners. In J. Alatis (Ed.), Georgetown University Round Table 1993 (pp.96-108). Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.

Doughty, C. (2001). Cognitive underpinning of focus on form. In P. Robinson (ed.) Cognition and second language instruction (pp. 206-257). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Ellis, R., Basturkmen, H., & Loewen, S. (2001). Learner uptake in communicative ESL lessons. Language Learning, 51, 281-318.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1467-9922.00156

Ellis, R., Loewen, S., & Erlam, R. (2006). Implicit and explicit corrective feedback and the acquisition of L2 grammar. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 28,339-368.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0272263106060141

Ferris, D. (1997). The influence of teacher commentary on student revision. TESOL Quarterly, 31, 315-339.
http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/3588049

Ferris, D. (2002). Treatment of error in second language student writing. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.

Ferris, D., & Roberts, B. (2001). Error feedback in L2 writing classes: How explicit does it need to be? Journal of Second Language Writing. 10, 161-184.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1060-3743(01)00039-X

García-Mayo, M., & Pica, T. (2000). L2 learner interaction in a foreign language setting: Are learning needs addressed? IRAL, 38, 35-58.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/iral.2000.38.1.35

Iwashita, N. (2003). Negative feedback and positive evidence in task-based interaction. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 25,1-36.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0272263103000019

LaPierre, D. (1994). Language output in a cooperative learning setting: Determining its effects on second language learning. Unpublished master’s thesis, Ontario Institute for Studies in Education, University of Toronto, Ontario, Canada.

Lightbown, P.M., & Spada, N. (1999). How languages are learned. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.

Long, M. (1996). The role of the linguistic environment in second language acquisition. In W.C. Ritchie & T.K. Bhatia (Eds.), Handbook of second language acquisition (pp. 413-468). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.

Lyster, R., & Ranta, L. (1997). Corrective feedback and learner uptake: Negotiation form in communicative classrooms. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 19, 37-66.

Nassaji, H., & Swain, M. (2000). A Vygotskian perspective on corrective feedback in L2: The effect of random versus negotiated help on the learning of English articles. Language Awareness,9, 34-50.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09658410008667135

Schmidt, R. (1990). The role of consciousness in second language learning. Applied Linguistics, 11, 17–46.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/applin/11.2.129

Schmidt, R. (2001). Attention. In P. Robinson (Ed.), Cognition and second language instruction (pp.3-32). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Spada, N. & Lightbown, P. M. (1993). Instruction and the development of questions in L2 classrooms. Studies in Second Language Acquisition. 15, 205-224.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0272263100011967

Swain, M. (1985). Communicative competence: Some roles of comprehensible input and comprehensible output in its development. In S. Gass & C. Madden (Eds.), Input in second language acquisition (pp. 235–253). Rowley, Mass.: Newbury House.

Swain, M. (1995). Three functions of output in second language learning. In G. Cook B. Seidlhofer (Eds.), Principle and practice in applied linguistics; Studies in honour of William E. Rutherford (pp.125–144).Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Swain, M. (1997). The output hypothesis, focus on form and second language learning. In V. Berry, B. Adamson & W. Littlewood (Eds.). Applying linguistics: Insights into language in education (pp. 1–21). Hong Kong: The University of Hong Kong, The English Centre.

Swain, M. (1998). Focus on form through conscious reflection. In C. Doughty & J. Williams (Eds.), Focus on form in classroom second language acquisition (pp. 64–81). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Swain, M., & Lapkin, S. (2001). Focus on form through collaborative dialogue: Exploring task effects. In M., Bygate, P. Skehan & M. Swain (Eds.), Researching pedagogic tasks: Second language learning, teaching and testing (pp. 99–118) London: Longman.

Williams, J. (2001). The effectiveness of spontaneous attention to form. System, 29, 325-340.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0346-251X(01)00022-7