Journal of Language Teaching and Research, Vol 2, No 5 (2011), 1136-1145, Sep 2011
doi:10.4304/jltr.2.5.1136-1145

Feedback in ESL Writing: Toward an Interactional Approach

Hamdollah Ravand, Abbas Eslami Rasekh

Abstract


The role of feedback on writing involves complex issues and needs to be considered within the total context in which the feedback is given. The reason studies examining feedback effects are so inconsistent may be a function of the fact that these studies consider feedback issue from a single perspective. To deal with this problem, feedback is first defined from different perspectives, then different aspects of feedback are discussed and after that a discussion of the factors that affect the influence of feedback on second language writing follows and finally a model where all the factors interact to influence feedback practices in second langue writing is presented.


Keywords


feedback; second language writing; feedback variables; learner variables; instructional variables

References


Allaei, S. K., & Connor, U. (1990). Using performative assessment instruments with ESL student writers. In L. Hamp-Lyons (Ed.), Assessing second language writing in academic contexts (pp. 227-240). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.

Amores, M. 3. (1997). A new perspective on peer-editing. Foreign Language Annals, 30(4), 513-523.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1944-9720.1997.tb00858.x

Anson, C. M. (1997). In our own voices: Using recorded commentary to respond to writing. In P. Elbow & M. D. Sorcinelli (Eds.), Writing to learn: Strategies for assigning and responding to writing across the disciplines (pp. 105- 115). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

Batestone, R. (1996). Noticing. ELT Journal, 50, 273.

Burt, M.K., &C. Kiparsky, 1974: ―Global and Local Mistakes,‖ in J. Schumann and N. Stenson (ed), New Frontiers in the Second Language Learning, Rowley, MA: Newbury House, pp.71-80

Boswood, T., & Dwyer, R. (1995/96). From marking to feedback: Audio-taped responses to student writing. TESOL Journal, 5(2), 20-23.

Brown, F. J. (1932). Knowledge of results as an incentive in school room practice. Journal of Educational Psychology, 23(7), 532–552.

Chaudron, C. (1984). The effects of feedback on students‘ composition revisions. RELC Journal, 15, 1-14.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/003368828401500201

Clariana, R. B. (1990). A comparison of answer-until-correct feedback and knowledge of-correct-Response feedback under two conditions of contextualization. Journal of n Computer-Based Instruction, 17(4), 125–129.

Cohen, A. D.(1987). Student processing of feedback on their compositions. In A. Wendon and R. Ribu (Eds.), Learner strategies in language learning (57- 69) Prentice Hall.

Conrad, S., & Goldstein, L. (1999). ESL student revision after teacher-written comments: Text, contexts, and individuals. Journal of Second Language Writing, 8, 147-180.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1060-3743(99)80126-X

Corder, S.P., (1978). ―Language-learner language,‖ in J. P. Richards (ed), Understanding Second and Foreign Language Learning: Issues and Approaches, Rowley, MA: Newbury House, pp.71-93

Cryer, P., & Kaikumba, N. (1987). Audio-cassette tape as a means of giving feedback non written work. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 12, 148-153.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/0260293870120207

Diaz, D. (1991). Writing, collaborative learning, and community. College ESL, 1(1), 19- 24.

DiGiovanni, E., & Nagaswarni, G. (2001). Online peer review: An alternative to face-to f ace? ELT Journal, 55(3), 263-272.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/elt/55.3.263

Doughty, C., & Williams, J. (Eds.). (1998). Focus on form in classroom second language acquisition. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

Edmondson, W. (1993). ―What Do Learners Get out of Teachers‘ Treatment of Errors?‖ Paper read at the 10th AILA Congress, Amsterdam.

Ellis, R. (1995). Interpretation tasks for grammar teaching. TESOL Quarterly, 29(1), 87- 105.
http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/3587806

Fazio, L. (2001). The effect of corrections and commentaries on the journal writing accuracy of minority- and majority-language students. Journal of Second Language Writing, 10(4), 235-249.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1060-3743(01)00042-X

Ferris, D. R. (1995). Student reactions to teacher response in multiple-draft composition classrooms. TESOL Quarterly, 29(1), 35-51.
http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/3587804

Ferris, D. R. (1997). The influence of teacher commentary on student revision. TESOL Quarterly, 31, 3 15-339.

Ferris, D. R. (1999). The case for grammar correction in L2 writing classes: A response to Truscott (1996). Journal of Second Language Writing, 8(1), 1-11.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1060-3743(99)80110-6

Ferris, D. R., Pezone, S., Tade, C. R., & Tinti, S. (1997). Teacher commentary on student writing: Descriptions and implications. Journal of Second Language Writing, 6(2), 155-182.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1060-3743(97)90032-1

Ferris, D., & Roberts, B. (2001). Error feedback in L2 writing classes: How explicit does it need to be? Journal of Second Language Writing, 10(3), 16 1-184.

Frankenberg-Garcia, A. (1999). Providing student writers with pre-text feedback. ELT Journal, 53(2), 100-106.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/elt/53.2.100

Frantzen, D. (1995). The effects of grammar supplementation on written accuracy in an intermediate Spanish content course. The Modern Language Journal, 79(3), 329- 344.
http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/329349

Gaynor, P. (1981). The effect of feedback delay on retention of computer-based mathematical material. Journal of Computer-Based Instruction, 8(2), 28–34.

Goldstein, L. M. (2001). For Kyla: What does the research say about responding to ESL writers? In T. Silva & P. K. Matsuda (Eds.), On second language writing (pp. 73- 89. Mahwah. NJ: Lawrence Eribaum Associates. Goldstein, L. M., & Conrad, S. (1990). Student input and the negotiation of meaning in ESL writing conferences. TESOL Quarterly, 24(3), 443- 460.

Guerrero, M. C. M. de & Villarnil, 0. S. (1994). Social-cognitive dimensions of interaction in L2 peer revision. The Modern Language Journal, 78(4), 4 84-496.

Guerrero, M. C. M. de & Villamil, 0. S. (2000). Activating the ZPD: Mutual scaffolding in L2 peer revision. The Modern Language Journal, 84(1), 51-68.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/0026-7902.00052

Hanna, G. S. (1976). Effects of total and partial feedback in multiple-choice testing upon learning. Journal of Educational Research, 69(5), 202–205.

Hedgcock, 3. & Lefkowitz, N. (1992). Collaborative oral/aural revision in foreign language writing instruction. Journal of Second Language Writing, 1(3), 255-276.

Hedgcock, J., & Lefkowitz, N. (1994). Feedback on feedback: Assessing learner receptivity to teacher response in L2 composing. Journal of Second Language Writing, 3(2), 141-163.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/1060-3743(94)90012-4

Hedgcock, J., & Lefkowitz, N. (1996). Some input on input: Two analyses of student response to expert feedback in L2 writing. The Modern Language Journal, 80(3), 287-308.
http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/329437

Hyland, F. (2000). ESL writers and feedback: Giving more autonomy to students. Language Teaching Research, 4(1), 33-54.

IzumiS., & Bigelow, M. (2000). Does output promote noticing and second language acquisition? TESOL Quarterly. 34 (2), 239-278.
http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/3587952

Krashen, S. (1985). The input hypothesis: Issues and implications. London and New York: Longman.

Jacobs, G. M. (1989). Miscorrection in peer feedback in writing class. RELC Journal, 20, 68-76.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/003368828902000105

Johanson, R. (1999). Rethinking the red ink: Audio-feedback in the ESL writing classroom. Texas Papers in Foreign Language Education, 41(1), 3 1- 38.

Keh, C. L. (1990). Feedback in the writing process: A model and methods for implementation. ELT Journal, 44(4), 294-304.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/elt/44.4.294

Kepner, C. (1991). An experiment in the relationship of types of written feedback in the development of second-language writing skills. The Modern Language Journal, 75(3), 305-3 13.

Kozulin, A. (1986). Vygotsky in context. Introduction to L. Vygotsky, Thought and language Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.

Kulhavy, R. W., & Stock, W. (1989). Feedback in written instruction: The place of response certitude. Educational Psychology Review, 1(4), 279–308.

Kulhavy, R. W., & Wager, W. (1993). Feedback in programmed instruction: Historical context and implications for practice. In J. V. Dempsey, & G. C. Sales (Eds.), Interactive instruction and feedback (pp. 3–20). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Educational Technology.

Lantolf, J. (Ed.). (2000). Sociocultural theory and second language learning. New York: Oxford University Press.

Lalande, J. (1982). ―Reducing composition errors : an experiment,‖ Modern Language Journal 66,pp. 140-149
http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/326382

Larsen Freeman, D. and M. H. Long, (1991). An Introduction to Second Language Acquisition Research. New York: Longman

Leki, 1. (1991). The preferences of ESL students for error correction in college- level writing classes. Foreign Language Annals, 24, 203-218.

Leki, I. (1992). Understanding ESL writers. Portsmouth, NH: Boynton/Cook Publishers.

Lockhart, C., & Ng, P. (1995a). Analyzing talk in ESL peer response groups: Stances, functions, and content. Language Learning, 45(4), 605-655.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-1770.1995.tb00456.x

Long, M. (1996). The role of the linguistic environment in second language acquisition. In W. Ritchie & T. Bhatia (Eds.), Handbook of second Language acquisition (pp. 413-468). New York: Academic Press.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/B978-012589042-7/50015-3

Lyster, R. & Ranta, L. (1997). Corrective feedback and learner uptake: Negotiation of form in communicative classrooms. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 19, 37-66.

McAlpine, L. (1989). Teacher-as-reader: Oral feedback on ESL student writing. TESL Canada Journal, 7(1), 62-67.

Mangelsdorf, K. (1992). Peer reviews in the ESL composition classroom: What do the students think? ELT Journal, 46(3), 274-283.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/elt/46.3.274

Mason, B. J., & Bruning, R. (2001). Providing feedback in computer-based instruction: What the research tells us. Center for Instructional Innovation, University of Nebraska–Lincoln: 14. Retrieved June 1, 2006, from http://dwb.unl.edu/Edit/MB/MasonBruning.html

McGroarty, M. E., & Zhu, W. (1997). Triangulation in classroom research: A study of peer revision. Language Learning, 47(1), 1—43. Mendonça, C. 0., & Johnson, K. E. (1994). Peer review negotiations: Revision activities in ESL writing instruction. TESOL Quarterly, 28(4), 745- 768.

Mory, E. H. (1994). Adaptive feedback in computer-based instruction: Effects of response certitude on performance, feedback-study time, and efficiency. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 11(3), 263–290.

Narciss, S., & Huth, K. (2004). How to design informative tutoring feedback for multimedia learning. In H. M. Niegemann, D. Leutner, & R. Brunken (Ed.), Instructional design for multimedia learning (pp. 181–195). Munster, NY: Waxmann.

Nelson, G., & Carson, 3. G. (1998). ESL students‘ perceptions of effectiveness in peer response groups. Journal of Second Language Writing, 7(2), 113-131.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1060-3743(98)90010-8

Nelson, G., & Murphy, M. (1993). Peer response groups: Do L2 writers use peer comments in revising their drafts? TESOL Quarterly, 27(1), 135-141.
http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/3586965

Patthey-Chavez, G. G., & Ferris, D. R. (1997). Writing conferences and the weaving of multi-voiced texts in college composition. Research in the Teaching of English, 31(1), 51-90.

Polio, C., Fleck, C., & Leder, N., (1998). ―If I only had more time:‖ ESL learners‘ changes in linguistic accuracy on essay revisions. Journal of Second Language Writing,(1), 43-68.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1060-3743(98)90005-4

Porto, M. (2001). Cooperative writing response groups and self-evaluation. ELT Journal, 55(1), 38-46.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/elt/55.1.38

Pressey, S. L. (1926). A simple device which gives tests and scores—and teaches. School and Society, 23,373–376.

Pressey, S. L. (1927). A machine for automatic teaching of drill material. School and Society, 25, 549–552.

Qi, D.S., & Lapkin, S. (2001). Exploring the role of noticing in a three-stage second language writing task. Journal of Second Language Writing, 10, 277-303.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1060-3743(01)00046-7

Robinson, P. (1995). Review article: Attention, memory, and the ―noticing‖ hypothesis. Language Learning, 45, 283-331.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-1770.1995.tb00441.x

Roper, W. J. (1977). Feedback in computer assisted instruction. Programmed Learning and Educational Technology, 14(1), 43–49.

Saito, H. (1994). Teachers‘ practices and students‘ preferences for feedback on second language writers: A case study of adult ESL learners. TESL Canada Journal, 11(2), 46-70.

Schmidt, R. (1990). The role of consciousness in second language learning. Applied Linguistics, 11, 129-158.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/applin/11.2.129

Schmidt, R. (1994). Deconstructing consciousness in search of useful definitions for applied linguistics. AIM Review, 11,11-26.

Semke, H. (1984). The effects of the red pen. Foreign Language Annals, 17, 195- 202.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1944-9720.1984.tb01727.x

Sengupta, S. (1998). Peer evaluation: ―I am not the teacher‖ ELT Journal, 52(1), 19-26.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/elt/52.1.19

Sheppard, K. (1992). Two feedback types: Do they make a difference? RELC Journal, 23, 103-110.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/003368829202300107

Silva, T. (1991). Second language composition instruction: developments, issues, and directions in ESL. In B. Kroll (Ed.), Second language writing: Research insights for the classroom (pp. 11-23). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Silva, T. (1993). Toward an understanding of the distinct nature of L2 writing: The ESL research and its implications. TESOL Quarterly, 27, 657-677.
http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/3587400

Stanley, J. (1992). Coaching student writers to be effective peer evaluators. Journal of Second Language Writing, 1(3), 217-233.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/1060-3743(92)90004-9

Svartvik, J.(1973). Errata: Papers in Error Analysis. Lund, Sweden: CWK Gleerup.


Full Text: PDF


Journal of Language Teaching and Research (JLTR, ISSN 1798-4769)

Copyright @ 2006-2014 by ACADEMY PUBLISHER – All rights reserved.