Journal of Emerging Technologies in Web Intelligence, Vol 3, No 1 (2011), 38-46, Feb 2011

Knowledge Building in User-Generated Online Virtual Realities

Johannes Moskaliuk, Joachim Kimmerle, Ulrike Cress, Friedrich W. Hesse


In this article, we will point out the impact of user-generated online Virtual Realities (VRs) on individual learning and knowledge building. For this purpose, we will first explain some of the key features of VRs, such as presence and immersion. We will then describe the specific qualities of user-generated online VRs: They have typical features of the Web 2.0, in that users have the opportunity to create content and objects themselves. We will also explain the concept of knowledge building and highlight its applicability in the context of user-generated online VRs. We will point out the key factors of successful knowledge building by discussing the visualization of educational content, learner-object interaction, as well as personal, social and environmental presence.


Virtual Reality, Knowledge Building, Learning, Web 2.0, Immersion, User-Generated Content


[1] Scardamalia, M., & Bereiter, C. (1994). Computer support for knowledge-building communities. J Learn Sci, 3(3), 265-283.

[2] Scardamalia, M., & Bereiter, C. (2006). Knowledge building: Theory, pedagogy, and technology. In K. Sawyer (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of the learning sciences (pp. 97-115). New York: Cambridge University Press.

[3] Cress, U., & Kimmerle, J. (2008). A systemic and cognitive view on collaborative knowledge building with wikis. Int J Compu-Supp Collab Lear, 3(2), 105-122.

[4] Lanier, J., & Biocca, F. (1992). An insider's view of the future of virtual reality. J Commun, 42(4), 150-172.

[5] Krueger, M. W. (1991). Artificial Reality. New York: Addison-Wesley.

[6] Novak, M. (1991). Liquid architectures in cyberspace. In M. Benedict (Eds.), Cyberspace: First steps. (pp. 225-254). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

[7] Slater, D. (2002). Social relationships and identity online and offline. In L. A. Lievrouw & S. M. Livingstone (Eds.), Handbook of new media: Social shaping and consequences of ICTs (pp. 533-546). London: Sage.

[8] Sheridan, T. B. (1992). Musings on telepresence and virtual presence. Presence (Camb), 1(1), 120-126.

[9] Ijsselsteijn, W. A. (2004). Presence in Depth. Eindhoven: University of Technology.

[10] Zhao, S., & Elesh, D. (2008). Copresence as 'Being with': Social contact in online public domains. Inf Commun Soc, 11(4), 565-583.

[11] Steuer, J. (1992). Defining virtual reality: Dimensions determining telepresence. J Commun, 42(4), 73-93.

[12] Lombard, M., & Ditton, T. (1997). At the heart of it all: The concept of presence. J Comput Mediat Commun, 3(2).

[13] Naimark, M. (1990). Realness and interactivity. In B. Laurel (Ed.), The art of human computer interface design (pp. 455-459). Boston: Addison Wesley.

[14] Zeltzer, D. (1992). Autonomy, interaction, and presence. Presence (Camb), 1(1), 127-132.

[15] Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000). Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. Am Psychol, 55(1), 68-78.

[16] Csíkszentmihályi, M. (1990). Flow: The psychology of optimal experience. New York: Harper and Row.

[17] Scardamalia, M., & Bereiter, C. (1996). Student communities for the advancement of knowledge. Commun ACM, 39(4), 36-37.

[18] Scardamalia, M. & Bereiter, C. (2003). Knowledge building. In J. W. Guthrie (Ed.), Encyclopedia of Education (pp. 1370-1373). New York: Macmillan Reference.

[19] Scardamalia, M. (2002). Collective cognitive responsibility for the advancement of knowledge. In B. Smith (Ed.), Liberal education in a knowledge society (pp. 67-98). Chicago: Open Court.

[20] Tapscott, D. and Williams, A.D. (2006). Wikinomics: How mass collaboration changes everything. New York: Portfolio.

[21] Johnson, S. (2002). Emergence: The Connected Lives of Ants, Brains, Cities, and Software. New York: Scribner.

[22] Cress, U., & Kimmerle, J. (2007). A theoretical framework for collaborative knowledge building with wikis: A systemic and cognitive perspective. In C. Chinn, G. Erkens, & S. Puntambekar. (Eds.), Proceedings of the 7th Computer Supported Collaborative Learning Conference (pp. 153-161). New Brunswick: International Society of the Learning Sciences.

[23] Moskaliuk, J., Kimmerle, J., & Cress (2009). Wiki-supported learning and knowledge building: effects of incongruity between knowledge and information. J Comput Assist Learn, 25, 549-561.

[24] Kimmerle, J., Moskaliuk, J., Cress, U., & Thiel, A. (in press). A systems theoretical approach to online knowledge building. AI Soc.

[25] Leuf, B., & Cunningham, W. (2001). The wiki way. Quick collaboration on the web. Boston: Addison-Wesley.

[26] Raitman, R., Augar, N., & Zhou, W. (2005). Employing wikis for online collaboration in the e-learning environment: Case study. Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Information Technology and Applications, ICITA 2005 II (pp. 142-146). Washington, DC: IEEE Computer Society.

[27] Fuchs-Kittowski, F., & Köhler, A. (2005). Wiki communities in the context of work processes. WikiSym 2005 – Conference Proceedings of the 2005 International Symposium on Wikis 2005 (pp. 33-39). New York: ACM Press.

[28] Köhler, A., & Fuchs-Kittowski, F. (2005). Integration of communities into process-oriented structures. J Univers Comput Sci, 11(3), 410-425.

[29] Moskaliuk, J., & Kimmerle, J. (2009). Using wikis for organizational learning: Functional and psycho-social principles. Dev Learn Org, 23(4), 21-24.

[30] Kafai, Y. B. (2005). Constructionism. In R. K. Sawyer (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of the learning sciences (pp. 35-46). New York: Cambridge University Press.

[31] Bruckman, A. (2006). Learning in online communities. In R. Sawyer (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of the learning sciences (pp. 461-472). New York: Cambridge University Press.

[32] Kimmerle, J., Cress, U., & Held, C. (in press). The interplay between individual and collective knowledge: Technologies for organisational learning and knowledge building. Knowl Manag Res Pract.

[33] Riss, U. V., Cress, U., Kimmerle, J., & Martin, S. (2007). Knowledge transfer by sharing task templates: Two approaches and their psychological requirements. Knowl Manag Res Pract, 5(4), 287-296.

[34] Gay, E. (1994). Is virtual reality a good teaching tool? Virtual Reality Special Report, 1(4), 51-59.

[35] Paivio, A. (1990). Mental representations: A dual coding approach. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

[36] Shepard, R. N. (1967). Recognition memory for words, sentences, and pictures. J Verb Learn Verb Be, 6(1), 156-163.

[37] Bransford, J. D., Sherwood, R. D., Hasselbring, T. S., Kinzer, C. K., & Williams, S. M. (1990). Anchored instruction: Why we need it and how technology can help. In D. Nix & R. Spiro (Eds.), Cognition, education, and multimedia: Exploring ideas in high technology (pp. 115-141). Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

[38] Cognition and Technology Group at Vanderbilt (1992). Anchored instruction in science and mathematics: Theoretical basis, developmental projects, and initial research findings. In R. A. Duschl & R. J. Hamilton (Eds.), Philosophy of Science, cognitive psychology, and educational theory and practice (pp. 244-273). Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.

[39] Biocca, F. (1996). Intelligence augmentation: The vision inside virtual reality. In B. Gorayska & M. Jakob L. (Eds.), Cognitive Technology: In Search of a Humane Interface (pp. 59-78). Amsterdam: Elsevier.

[40] Clark, A. (1997). Being There: Putting Brain, Body, and World Together Again. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

[41] Anderson, M. L. (2003). Embodied cognition: A field guide. Artif Int, 149(1), 91-130.

[42] Winn, W. (1993). A conceptual basis for educational applications of virtual reality, HITLab Tech Report R-93-9. Seattle: University of Washington, Human Interface Technology Laboratory.

[43] Bruner, J. S. (1961). The act of discovery. Harvard Educ Rev, 31, 21-32.

[44] Salomon, G. (1994). Interaction of media, cognition, and learning: An exploration of how symbolic forms cultivate mental skills and affect knowledge acquisition. Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

[45] Heeter, C. (1992). Being there: the subjective experience of presence. Presence-Teleop Virt, 1(2), 262-271.

[46] Biocca, F., Harms, C., & Burgoon, J. K. (2003). Toward a more robust theory and measure of social presence: Review and suggested criteria. Presence-Teleop Virt, 12(5), 456-480.

[47] Tajfel, H., & Turner, J. C. (1986). The social identity theory of intergroup behavior. In S. Worchel & W. Austin (Eds.), Psychology of intergroup relations (vol. 2, pp. 7-24). Chicago: Nelson-Hall Publishers.

[48] Kimmerle, J., Wodzicki, K, & Cress, U. (2008). The social psychology of knowledge management. Team Perform Man, 14, 381-401.

[49] Clark, H. H. (1996). Using Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

[50] Bandura, A. (1977). Social learning theory. Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey: Prentice-Hall.

[51] Gutwin, C., & Greenberg, S. (2002). A descriptive framework of workspace awareness for real-time groupware. Comp Support Cooperat W, 11(3), 411-446.

[52] Kimmerle, J., Cress, U., & Hesse, F. W. (2007). An interactional perspective on group awareness: Alleviating the information-exchange dilemma (for everybody?). Int Jof Hum-Comput St, 65(11), 899-910.

[53] Kimmerle, J., & Cress, U. (2008). Group awareness and self-presentation in computer-supported information exchange. Int J Compu-Supp Collab Lear, 3, 85-97.

[54] Kimmerle, J., & Cress, U. (2009). Visualization of group members' participation: How information presentation formats support information exchange. Soc Sci Comput Rev, 27, 243-261.

[55] Kiesler, S., Siegel, J. & McGuire, T. (1984). Social psychological aspects of computer-mediated communication. Am Psychol, 39(10), 1123–1134.

[56] Culnan, M. J., & Markus, M. L. (1987). Information Technologies. In F. M. Jablin, L. L. Putnam, K. H. Roberts & L. W. Porter (Eds.), Handbook of organizational communication: An interdisciplinary perspective (pp. 420-443). Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.

[57] Godden, D. R., & Baddeley, A. D. (1975). Context-dependent memory in two natural environments: on land and underwater. Brit J Psychol 66(3), 325-331.

[58] Greeno, J. G. (1998). The situativity of knowing, learning, and research. Am Psychol, 53(1), 5-26.

[59] Brown, J. S., Collins, A., & Duguid, P. (1989). Situated cognition and the culture of learning. Educ Res, 18(1), 32-42.

[60] Hutchins, E. (1995). How a cockpit remembers its speeds. Cognitive Sci, 19(3), 265-288.

[61] Craik, F. I. M., & Lockhart, R. S. (1972). Levels of processing: A framework for memory research. J Verb Learn Verb Be, 11(6), 671-684.

[62] Kolodner, J. L., Camp, P. J., Crismond, D., Fasse, B., Gray, J., Holbrook, J., et al. (2003). Problem-based learning meets case-based reasoning in the middle-school science classroom: Putting learning by design into practice. J Learn Sci, 12(4), 495-547.

[63] Kolodner, J. L., Camp, P. J., Crismond, D., Fasse, B., Gray, J., Holbrook, J., et al. (2004). Promoting deep science learning through case-based reasoning: Rituals and practices in learning by design classrooms. In N. M. Seel & S. Dijkstra (Eds.), Curriculum, plans, and processes in instructional design: International perspectives. New York: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

[64] Collins, A., Brown, J. S., & Newman, S. E. (1986). Cognitive apprenticeship: Teaching the craft of reading, writing, and mathematics. Cambridge, MA: University of Illinois.

[65] Chi, M. T. H., Bassok, M., Lewis, M. W., Reimann, P, & Glaser, R. (1989). Self-explanations: How students study and use examples in learning to solve problems. Cognitive Sci, 13(2), 145-182.

[65] de Freitas, S., & Griffiths, M. (2008). The convergence of gaming practices with other media forms: What potential for learning? A review of the literature. Learn Media Technol 33(1), 10-20.

Full Text: PDF

Journal of Emerging Technologies in Web Intelligence (JETWI, ISSN 1798-0461)

Copyright @ 2006-2014 by ACADEMY PUBLISHER – All rights reserved.